The Core Centre (Core) is a registered charity where Sam, Becky and Jane run a community hub offering over 40 services and activities which combat loneliness, improve health, and provide practical support to vulnerable individuals, particularly the elderly, in Calverton and the rural surrounding villages in Gedling, Nottinghamshire. Core is a haven of kindness serving around 1,800 local people annually (15k interactions). We are a grass roots organisation delivering services like health and well-being activities, social eating lunch clubs, problem solving, arts and crafts, outreach and support clinics, a food pantry, and many initiatives are led by our wonderful and compassionate volunteers. Core’s work addresses the challenges of poverty, isolation and poor health, where we make a significant positive impact on individuals' lives by encouraging resilience, building social networks, and providing holistic and vital support. We are a route to market for all sorts of partners and organisations and we try to fill any local gaps in services where we can. Studies now show that social interaction is the most significant factor in overall longevity, something that Core deeply recognises, values and prioritises.

Our Work
Core’s work is primarily but not exclusively designed to support elderly people, many of whom have no family or support network. We recognises the elderly as a vulnerable group in society, recognising their unique challenges such as social isolation, mental and physical health issues, and the need for services that enhance their well-being and quality of life.
Need
At Core, over 80% of users are 65+, most widowed/living alone. We know that social isolation and loneliness are associated with increased risk of various health issues; cardiovascular problems, weakened immune systems, and mental health disorders.
Our clients tend to have:
●       Few opportunities for social interaction: Core is a grass roots, first point of contact. We try to make it our mission to resolve issues, preventing people’s problems from escalating. We have a wealth of knowledge and a network of partners to find solutions and one of our mottoes is “If we can’t help, we’ll find someone that can!”
●       Poor health: We help and encourage people to engage in wellbeing activities, e.g. Falls are the most common cause of injury related deaths in people over 75. 77% of our falls prevention attendees say that their strength and balance/well- being had improved.
●       Mental Health, people in crisis: Core helps improve mental health, reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. “I’m joining in lots of new activities - I practically live at The Core Centre now!” All our staff are mental health first aid trained and often intervene in crisis situations. Our mental health support is a cornerstone of our work, and we are equipped to respond to crises offering ongoing emotional assistance. Many people revisit Core after our interventions, some sit and paint or read just to be around people, others come for a cuppa and a general check in, others even go on to volunteer with us. The point is, they know there are people around who care and are interested in their wellbeing. By helping individuals manage stress, anxiety, and depression in a compassionate environment, we believe that we align with commitment to improving mental well-being and building resilient communities.
●       Lost their support networks; bereavement of family, friends or spouses, or sometimes newcomers to the community, feel displaced. Core’s relationships with the local GPs, social prescribers, NHS results in numerous referrals weekly to join one of our health groups, lunch club or activity, a reason to make friends and be part of the community. “I love the social session at the end, I live on my own now and don’t get to see many people - it's as important to me as the exercises.” Our befriending volunteers help people feel socially connected and part of something. Core acts as a support network where people feel they can express their worries, share good news and feel listened to.
●       Hearing loss: We know that hearing loss can lead to social isolation, communication difficulties, and a decline in mental and emotional well-being, impacting an individual's quality of life. Core’s free monthly hearing aid clinic, lower cost ear wax removal service and free hearing aid batteries dispense, help 500 people annually to improve their hearing and interactions with others.
●       Lack of Purpose: For some people, particularly those living alone, retirement can lead to feelings of purposelessness, affecting mental and emotional well-being. Our 30+ volunteers benefit from giving to the community (120 hours weekly). Volunteers deliver classes and fun activities. Our surveys indicate people are less anxious, happier and confident and able to cope with life from attending classes.
●       Poor IT skills: We know that low IT skills can limit access to essential services, hinder employment opportunities, and contribute to social exclusion, preventing individuals from fully participating in modern society, exacerbating feelings of isolation. At Core we offer mobile phone support and IT one to one sessions, help with difficult online forms, NHS app support clinic, free Wi-Fi and lap top use and basic IT courses.
●       Mobility Challenges: Our chair based exercise group and falls prevention participants state that they feel more resilient and empowered ‘I fell in my garden but remembered what we covered in class and I was able to crawl to a substantial plant pot and use that to help myself up.” Health issues which restrict people’s ability to leave their homes isolate them from their community and Core are currently running a loyalty scheme to encourage people to take “Extra Portions” of one of our other 6 exercise activities weekly as we know mobility is key!
●       Financial Strain: debt advice/help with difficult forms improves people’s access to necessary income helping resolve financial issues. Our services are free/low cost. Core is also a registered warm hub with advice on energy and our food pantry gives out 55 boxes of food worth around £15-20 for £4 weekly.
We believe that Garfield Weston Foundation’s mission to support projects that address social isolation and improve community well-being is strongly reflected in the work we do with vulnerable individuals, particularly those at risk of isolation and hardship. Getting older often results in feelings of not belonging, contributing to a sense of marginalization. Core is a haven of kindness with no excuse needed to come in, where the kettle is always on and someone will be on hand to talk.
Over 90% of our visitors access more than one of our 40+services and activities, with 55% accessing more than 4 or more. Delivery of the services and activities listed helps us create an environment which is welcoming, warm and supportive, drawing people into a support network. This also serves to address their loneliness and isolation, often at the root of other problems. We rarely work with people once. Often the issue people first arrive with simply gives them a reason to walk through the door and we take the time to build a relationship uncovering the real problems. Our support for each individual evolves and changes over time with them becoming part of our community, often then helping others e.g. volunteering or teaching a skill. On average we see people weekly for several months or even years. We believe that everything Core does aligns perfectly with your focus on funding initiatives that enable positive social change, empowering individuals, fostering community connections, and supporting local communities in times of need.
Everything is delivered at Core, is group based and delivered by volunteers or professional tutors:
Activity
Frequency
Duration
People yearly
Other Details
Strong and Steady Group
12 weeks, then ongoing
2 hours
50
 

Chair Based Exercise
Twice weekly
2 hours
60
Fitness instructor

Card Making Class
Twice weekly
2 hours
15
 

Bobbin Lace
Weekly
2 hours
15
 

Patchwork
Weekly
2 hours
10
 

Line Dancing (Beginners/Intermediate)
Twice weekly
2 x 2 hour sessions
50
St John Building, line dancing tutor

Table Tennis
Weekly
2 hours
40
 

Art Club
Weekly
2 hours
10
 

Family History
Twice weekly
2 x 1 hour slots
15
 

Christmas Craft
Weekly
2 hours
12
Tutor led

Managing Money Course
Weekly
2 hours
6
Tutor led

Tea & Toast/Coffee Morning
Weekly
2 hours
50
 

Walking Group
Weekly
2 hours
15
 

Knit/Natter
Twice weekly
2 hours
20
 

Drop-in Art
Weekly
2 hours
10
 

Carpet Bowls/Soup & Roll/Bingo
Weekly
2 hours
30
 

Relaxation
Twice weekly
2 x 1 hour
96
Therapist volunteer

Christmas Party
Yearly
N/A
150
 

MacMillan Coffee Morning
Yearly
N/A
80
 

Fashion Show Fundraiser
Yearly
N/A
150
 

Quiz Night Fundraiser
Yearly
N/A
100
 

Comedy/Magic Night Fundraisers
Yearly
N/A
120
 

Community Events
Various
Various
Various
Calverton village get together, Woodborough fair, Church events, Health & well-being event, Christmas Light switch on, Village promotions, Coop events

Litter Picking
Yearly
2 hours
200
 

Registered Warm Hub
Ongoing
N/A
200
 

 
Our food redistribution (Food Pantry), litter picking and energy-saving initiatives (Green Doctor referral), complements Garfield Weston Foundation’s interest in supporting local communities with sustainable, practical solutions.
This April, Core is excited to announce the launch of a new Memory Café to support individuals in our community living with dementia and memory loss. We've identified significant gaps in local services, and this initiative will provide a safe and welcoming space for those affected by memory loss, along with their families and carers.
Additionally, we are committed to restarting a local Men in Sheds group, which was disbanded after the lease on their workshop ended, leaving 93 men without a vital community resource. The loss of this space has had a profound impact on these men, and we are dedicated to providing them with the opportunity to rebuild connections, engage in meaningful activities, and regain a sense of purpose.
Service/Support
Frequency
Duration
People Yearly
Other Details
Personalised Problem Solving
One-to-one
N/A
960
Help/support/befriending

Mobile Phone Help
Weekly
1 hour
96
One-to-one

IT One-to-One
Weekly
4 x 1 hour slots
144
 

Citizens Advice
Weekly
3 x 1 hour slots
160
Remote access service

Social Eating Monthly Lunch Club
Monthly
2 hours
720
 

Blood Pressure Drop-In
Weekly
1 hour
96
Retired nurse/volunteer

Bereavement Group
12-week course
2 hours
15
Volunteer trained bereavement specialist

Job Club
Weekly
2 hours
96
Retired careers advisors, 1:1, StandGuide Agency

Difficult Form Help
As required
As needed
240
Attendance allowance, blue badge, bus pass, etc

Hearing Aid Clinic
Monthly
2 hours (15-minute slots)
60
Qualified technician “Hear Together”

Ear Wax Removal Clinic
Biweekly
2 hours
288
Audiologist, not available from GP

Carer’s Support Group
Monthly
4 hours
120
Carer’s Federation clinic (moving to Notts County Council)

Food Bank Referral Point
Weekly
As required
100
Staff-led

Covid Vaccination Drop-In
Twice yearly
All day
300
NHS

Green Doctor Referral
As needed
By phone
40
Energy advisor

Family Solicitor Advice
As needed
Free 30 minutes
96
Local solicitor

Food Pantry
Weekly
8 hours
100
Plus family members who benefit

Hearing Aid Battery Collection
As needed
N/A
144
 

General Problem Solving
As required
N/A
960
 
 

Case Study. Joanne first attended Core at a critical moment in her life; her partner who she had been the main carer for passed away. Joanne had no close family and felt very isolated since the pandemic. Initially, Core helped Joanne come to terms with her loss, offering emotional support; we encouraged her to attend our bereavement group. We also worked through paperwork/financial issues surrounding her husband’s estate. Over time Joanne’s relationship with Core became stronger and she decided to join our walking group. Joanne went from strength to strength making friends and building her confidence. We discovered that she’d lived in Calverton for over 3 years, rarely leaving home until coming to Core, so the walks were almost magical for her. Joanne also attended our seated exercise group, had IT help and now supports another lady who is house bound (contact through Core).
Impact and Achievements
We work with approximately 1800 people each year, delivering over 15,000 interactions. We know that individuals benefit from multiple and diverse interventions when building a support network. Combining various forms of support such as therapy, community involvement, and social connections, enhances overall wellbeing and resilience. Core builds relationships with individuals that encourage them to seek help for multiple issues, and form relationships with staff, volunteers and other people. Core has not only created a welcoming environment for participants but has also seen long-term impacts, such as increased community involvement, and higher rates of sustained independence among participants. Over the last 4 years, participant interactions have steadily risen from 7k interactions yearly to around 15k currently. 55% of participants continue to engage with four or more services, indicating a deepening connection and long-term support network.
●       139/146 people in a recent survey said there was nowhere else locally that provided the help that Core gives. One client stated “I feel that if I had a problem, I would feel much more able to cope now that I know the support Core provides”. This increase in resilience and wellbeing brings peace of mind and improved relationships for the wider family too “My mum and dad have been attending Core and it has been genuinely life changing for them. They’ve both made new friends and even gone out for meals together” Another user states “I never normally leave my home as I find it difficult to go out and meet people. My daughter insisted I come initially and I was really frightened about mixing with people, the kindness of the people here helped me feel at ease”. People feel comforted and supported by Core, so that they can go on to solve other issues in their lives, leading to greater resilience and independence. We know this as people return weekly recommending us to others and registers show that activities continue to be very well attended.
●       For our recently started lunch club, our initial pilot project for 65 people received overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of participants enjoying the experience and 73% attending to "get out of the house" and "make friends." This feedback indicates the project's effectiveness in combating loneliness and isolation. 
●       90% of craft group members to Core are regular attendees and many state it’s their main social activity weekly, many often use our other services when needed
●       77% of participants to the falls prevention clinic feel stronger, with better balance and would know how to get up from the floor safely. Many chair based exercisers claim it helps reduce pain from arthritis and other muscular skeletal issues. We know that line dancing, table tennis and walking all improve coordination, balance and flexibility as well as cardiovascular health and brain memory. Over 90% of our attendees report feeling more exhilarated, healthy and happier.
●       85% of those attending one of our hearing clinics feel more positive about their hearing. Studies prove improved hearing impacts relationships, cognitive function and emotional health, contributing to better quality of life for individuals dealing with impaired hearing. Many people visit us for help with hearing aids, ear wax removal etc. who’d struggle to travel further afield to seek help.
●       8/10 clients attending IT classes and support report that they’re able to navigate the digital world more competently, improving their ability to access other support, improving communication and connections with their family and friends.
●       Numerous studies highlight the positive effects of volunteering on individuals and communities. Volunteering is linked to lower rates of depression and increased life satisfaction among older adults. Volunteering at Core is an essential part of the service we provide, with 85% of volunteers remaining with us for over a year. Volunteers are trained in mental health first aid, food hygiene, and community development, furthering their personal growth while strengthening the capacity of the local community. Their feedback is consistently positive as they can see the power of the work that we all do on a daily basis. “Core has not only changed my life, but I can see the good impact it has on other people all the time”
●       Help completing difficult forms to access financial and other entitlements means they are filled in more accurately than individuals attempting on their own. Over 70% of applications are successful with our support. Our follow-up calls show us that people feel more independent and less of a burden on their busy families. Many express that they feel more empowered and confident to attempt to overcome problems themselves in the future and some go on to join our IT courses to build their skills further.
●       Council Outreach weekly clinics are consistently fully booked with 85% reporting their issue resolved or part resolved.
●       Citizen’s Advice weekly sessions are consistently oversubscribed with 80% of users stating overall satisfaction with their visit
●       Core’s food pantry has retained 75% of its original client base and provided over 3800 boxes of food in the last 2 years not only helping families with the cost of living crisis but preventing food waste.
 
Case Study. Angie first attended Core seeking help with a difficult form.  After becoming tearful and admitting to feeling low and struggling with her mental health, we offered emotional support. We encouraged Angie to join our knit and natter group. Initially she was very reluctant, but our befriending volunteer built a relationship with her and eventually Angie felt comfortable to attend. Since then, she has gone from strength to strength and has even taught several people in the community how to crochet. Moreover, Angie has completed an IT course and attended the Christmas Party. The tangible impact on Angie’s wellbeing and overall improved mental health is immeasurable and we were delighted when she announced that she has booked a trip to Scotland this year to visit her brother. We believe that without the support from Core, Angie would not have the confidence and resilience to do something so positive for herself.
Core’s monitoring and evaluation ensures Core measures/records all activities; ensures activities are evaluated to enable services to be adapted to best meet client needs; and enables us to report back to funders on impact/outcomes. We use the following methodologies:
●       Surveys/Feedback: We regularly gather feedback from our community members to understand their needs, satisfaction levels, and areas for improvement e.g. a recent survey showed 99% of 125 users surveyed said their overall wellbeing had improved since visiting
●       Qualitative data-surveys asking clients how they feel before/after interventions
●       Data Collection: tracking quantitative data such as the number of individuals served, types of services provided and measurable outcomes e.g oversubscribed Strong and Steady/mobility intervention.
●       Case Studies: We examine individual cases to understand the impact of interventions on specific people, highlighting success stories and identifying challenges.
●       Community Engagement: regularly engaging with our community through meetings, focus groups and forums to keep us informed about evolving needs and opinions on our services
●       Collaboration with Partners: We’ve built excellent links with other organisations/ government agencies/voluntary groups sharing information and resources. We work together and review the overall impact of community initiatives e.g. feedback from Health and Wellbeing event attended by 400 people
●       Trustee/volunteer training and reviews: We review and evaluate programs and services to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement
By employing a combination of these methods, Core has a comprehensive understanding of its impact. We can assess the effectiveness of all our initiatives, making informed decisions to better meet the needs of the vulnerable people we serve. For us, success is all about impacting positively on the lives of the people we support, and the measures we have set out above ensure that we understand how effectively we are doing that.
 
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
 
At Core, by the very nature of what we do, we deeply value every individual. Our commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is central to everything we do and we believe that all people, regardless of their background, deserve access to support, resources, and opportunities in a safe and welcoming environment. We know what it takes sometimes for someone to have the courage to walk through the door and seek help and the last thing we would ever consider would be to turn them away - kindness and acceptance are in our DNA! We understand the concept of intersectionality – that people experience discrimination and oppression in multiple and often overlapping ways. We recognise that each person’s experiences are unique and influenced by a range of factors, including but not limited to gender, race, age, class, sexual orientation, physical ability, and more. At Core, we consider all the various aspects of identity that can marginalise people and we actively work to address these barriers through our services, programs, and practices.
The Core Centre is a truly inclusive community hub that is open to all. Our central location in Calverton, Nottinghamshire, offers easy access with free parking and either free or very low-cost services. We do not means-test or restrict any of our services or activities based on income, identity, or background. Whether people come to us for health support, social activities, or advice, we aim to ensure that all services are accessible and welcoming. This open, non-judgmental approach is designed to help individuals from all walks of life feel comfortable and valued. We provide a safe space where people feel they belong and where they can connect with others across cultures and backgrounds.
In line with our commitment to inclusivity, we reduce barriers to participation by offering a friendly, walk-in model where no appointment is necessary. This "open door" approach removes the need for individuals to navigate complex systems to access support. We consistently seek feedback from those who use our services and encourage them to voice their opinions on all aspects of our work. This ensures that people feel heard, valued, and able to contribute to decision-making, helping us continuously improve and adapt to the needs of our diverse community.
Case Study. Neda came to The Core Centre during a tough time, struggling with bills and social isolation as a single parent with limited English. After building a relationship with Neda, we suggested she did some volunteering with us to build her confidence, introduce her to new people, and give her opportunities to practice English. The Core Centre’s support, including referrals for CV development and an ESOL course, empowered Neda to regain a sense of purpose. Volunteering not only helped her integrate into the community but also boosted her skills, paving the way for her to successfully gain part-time work. Neda now feels more confident, connected, and hopeful about her future, having gained both personal and practical skills through the charity’s holistic support.
At Core, we actively seek opportunities to celebrate diversity and engage with different cultural groups. For example, we’ve participated in the Ukrainian Society Meal, bringing together trustees, volunteers, and members of the local community to share food and conversation. We’ve also implemented a mobility scooter group to ensure that those with mobility challenges can engage with our services. Core sometimes works with refugees who have been rehomed locally, helping them access services and settle positively into their local community. Our food pantry is another example of how we celebrate diversity, as we aim to share recipes from around the world, promoting cultural exchange and inclusivity. Additionally, we host a free activity and lunch day for parents and children on free school meals in partnership with the Gedling Play Forum, reinforcing our commitment to supporting families from all backgrounds.
Partnerships
Core’s partnerships enhance service delivery, promote efficiency, and strengthen our ability to meet the needs of the local community. We work closely with many local, regional, and national partners, each of whom contributes to the success of our community-driven initiatives. We can bring partner services to our clients in a comfortable familiar environment.
Our most long-standing partnership with Gedling Borough Council has led to the creation of a monthly drop-in clinic, which has now been expanded to a weekly service. This increased capacity enables Core to offer critical support, including food vouchers, hardship payments, cost of living assistance, and other essential services. Our close working relationship is reflected in our involvement in the Partnership Group consulting on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, where we represent the Voluntary and Community Sector. We have also been invited to consult on how the voluntary sector can be better represented across Gedling.
Citizen’s Advice hold weekly virtual appointments at Core. These sessions are always fully booked, and we have requested an increase in their presence to meet the growing demand for advice and support. This collaboration helps us support individuals in need of legal, financial, and housing advice, crucial in the current cost-of-living crisis. Core has forged strong ties with Calverton GP Surgery, and receive referrals through social prescribing, enabling individuals to engage in health and social activities. This partnership has allowed us to offer health-related events, such as blood pressure and diabetes checks, at local community events. Furthermore, we work with the GPs to host joint health events, which demonstrates our ongoing commitment to improving the physical and mental well-being of our community.
We partner with Hear Together, providing a free monthly hearing aid check clinic at Core. This is vital for elderly residents who struggle with mobility and cannot easily travel to Nottingham. Similarly, ClearWax Ear Wax Removal Solutions collaborate with us to offer regular ear care clinics, ensuring that individuals with hearing issues, often exacerbated by age, can access affordable services locally.
Our ongoing partnership with Trussell Trust Arnold Food Bank has proven invaluable, especially in the face of rising demand for food support. Our volunteers regularly collect and deliver food parcels to individuals in need. In line with this, our Food Pantry Project collaborates with FairShare and Family Action, providing low-cost, healthy food options while tackling food waste.
We are committed to supporting vulnerable individuals during winter, operating a warm hub and distributing warm packs, in partnership with National Grid. Our growing relationships with local businesses, eg Land Smith Solicitors, Bargain Girls, The Springwater Golf Club, Rhubarbs Cafe, help us raise awareness of our work and secure valuable donations. Partnerships with organisations like Age UK, Nottingham Carers, Futures, and DWP ensure that Core remains at the forefront of addressing the needs of the community and support our ability to provide vital services, including CV writing, job-seeking advice, and support for carers. At Core, we also believe in the power of local collaboration, working with community groups like St John Ambulance, The Working Men’s Club, and Bags of Blessings, Calverton Theatre Group, to address social isolation and support individuals in need. Through these relationships, we bring together diverse groups, providing a strong support network for those who need it most. Our partnerships extend to local government and schools, eg working to promote volunteer opportunities and advertise our services. We actively participate in various community forums, such as the Arnold and Carlton Community Engagement Group and Gedling Seniors Network, ensuring we are always in tune with the evolving needs of the community.
In conclusion, Core is deeply rooted in our local community and committed to working collaboratively with a wide range of partners. These collaborations not only make our work more efficient, but they also help us build a resilient and inclusive community, aligning with Garfield Weston Foundation’s commitment to supporting organisations that drive positive change and foster community cohesion.
Our People
Core is led by a dedicated and passionate team, with both managers and trustees possessing extensive experience and a deep commitment to improving the lives of local people. Our small team includes Sam, a Calverton resident who has been connected to Core for over 20 years. With a strong background in customer service, sales, and volunteer management, Sam brings a wealth of experience in team leadership and charity work. Her motivation to serve her community and her drive to continuously improve Core's offerings make her an invaluable leader. Becky, also a long-term member of the Core community, has a background in education and senior leadership. As an ex primary school teacher, Becky brings creative thinking and innovative ideas to Core. Her passion for community engagement, paired with her practical experience, ensures that Core’s services evolve to meet the changing needs of the community. Core’s trustees, a diverse and committed group of eight, play a key role in the charity’s success. They are hands-on volunteers, leading activities like food pantry management, teaching bobbin lace, and offering support with difficult forms and befriending. Their experience and insight guide Core’s strategy, ensuring we remain deeply connected to our community and also aligned with the values of supporting skilled, passionate leadership.
Our Finances
 We have a robust plan in place to fund our work. Core was for many years dependent almost entirely on the National Lottery for funding. The current managers took over in January 2021 and immediately recognised this over-dependence on one funding source as a concern. The current Lottery funding was coming to an end, and following discussions, National Lottery agreed a further year’s funding at 100% for 2022/23, and also awarded additional development funding to enable the new managers to explore other funding opportunities and develop their skills in securing funding. This has been successfully achieved over the last 2 years, with the Lottery agreeing a further 4 year bid covering 2023/2024 to 2026/2027. This tranche of funding was based on a taper approach to allow us time to secure other funding, resulting overall in National Lottery now providing under 50% of our funding. We are confident this is the appropriate level of funding for the funders to provide longer-term support for us on a sustainable basis, and we intend on applying for a further 4 years to meet 40-50% of our annual costs from 2027 onwards.
We developed a reserves strategy and now aim to hold reserves of 6-12 months of running costs, ensuring that any shortfalls in funding do not immediately threaten the survival of Core. We now plan our finances on a longer-term basis, typically producing 2-3 year forward budgets to enable us to work on any shortfalls in plenty of time, and if necessary to scale our services.
Having successfully diversified our income sources, we now operate through a ‘cocktail’ of funding. To keep our services delivering effectively, we need to secure approximately £100-110k each year. Additional short term projects often increase our costs, but these come with corresponding income (eg Lottery Lunch Club). Funding sources inevitably vary each year, but an approximate breakdown is as follows -
-National Lottery - our main funder, providing approx 40% of our annual funding currently.
-Grants. We have significantly improved our ability to apply for funding from trusts and charitable foundations, and from local government. Recent successes include Sport England, Coalfields Regeneration, Nottinghamshire County Council, Gedling District Council, Jigsaw Homes, Severn Trent Water, National Grid, Masons Charitable Trust, Co-Op Community Fund, Versus Arthritis.
Grants from sources such as these now account for approx 35% of our annual funding. We aim to fill the gaps shown in the 2 year budget enclosed primarily through grant applications.
-Sales. We secure small contributions from clients when they participate in activities. eg clients may pay £2-3 to take part in classes or groups, and £4 towards our lunch club. We always ensure that these charges are very affordable, and have arrangements to ensure that we can sensitively ensure that people who cannot afford to pay are able to attend for free. We never want our charges to be a barrier. We secure around 15% of our funding in this way.
-Fundraising. We hold events and also try to attract funding from local businesses and individuals who support our work. We have improved our ability to do this over the last couple of years and now secure around 8% of our funding through donations and events.
-The remaining funding (approximately 2%) comes from small contributions from partners and from interest earned on our reserves.
Our local community supports our work, and we can demonstrate this in several ways - from the take-up and participation in our activities and everything we do, through to the income we earn from our clients and our local partners. Our clients value what we do and those who can afford to are more than willing to pay a small contribution, usually £2-3. These contributions add up to a valuable income stream for us. Our local partners, including businesses, councillors, and the Parish, District and County Councils all provide financial support to us. There are no other local organisations who do what we do, and Core is very much valued by clients, partners, local government and funding bodies.
Case Study Angie. Angie first attended Core seeking help with a difficult from.  After becoming tearful and admittedly feeling low and struggling with her mental health, we offered Angie some emotional support. We encouraged Angie to return and join our knit and natter group. Initially she was very reluctant, but our befriending volunteer began to build a relationship with her and eventually Angie felt more comfortable to attend. Since then, she has gone from strength to strength and has even taught several people in the community how to crochet. Moreover, Angie has completed an IT course and attended the Christmas Party. The tangible impact on Angie’s wellbeing and overall improved mental health is immeasurable and we were delighted when she announced that she has booked a trip to Scotland this year to visit her brother. We believe that without the support from Core, Angie would not have the confidence and resilience to do something so positive for herself.
Core is well respected and a valuable community hub for Calverton and the surrounding areas with over 15000 interactions each year, increasing access to recreational, wellbeing and social activities for approx. 1800 people yearly. 90% of users to Core access more than one service at Core and 55% more than 4 services. 99 % said their overall wellbeing had improved since visiting Core. Research indicates that individuals benefit from multiple interventions when building a support network. Studies show that combining various forms of support such as therapy, community involvement, and social connections, enhances overall wellbeing and resilience. Diverse interventions address different aspects of a person’s life, fostering a more comprehensive and robust support system.
Core have reduced social isolation through befriending activities for over 250 people each year. Studies show that people engaged with community hubs report a 30% improvement in perceived support networks. We know that many of our users describe us as a “life line” and in a recent survey 139 out of 146 clients said that there wasn’t anywhere else in their local community that provides the services Core offers.
On average 60 people a week access craft or creative activities at Core – people have a purpose to come out, make meaningful friendships and feel more positive about life reducing the sense of social isolation which leads to mental health problems. A study published in the Journal of Positive Psychology found that individuals who engage in creative activities, including crafting, reported higher levels of positive emotions and increased social wellbeing. Over 90% of craft group members to Core are regular attendees and many state it is their main social activity of the week.
Computers for beginners and mobile phone/lap top one to one help, have improved digital access through IT training for over 164 people each year. A 2019 survey by XYZ Research found that 80 % of participants report an increased sense of belonging and connection after engaging in IT training.
Case Study Ivy. One simple but powerful example at Core is Ivy. Ivy attends our chair based exercise groups but noticed that we also helped with IT. She has now learned how to use her mobile phone and can access WhatsApp allowing her to regularly keep in touch with friends and family. “It’s brilliant, I can talk to them anytime now for free, especially when I have a problem”
Core have increased access to educational classes and training courses for well over 80 people this year. 91% of users surveyed at Core said they had found their course useful. A study published in the Journal of Positive Psychology indicate that educational experiences contribute to increased problem solving abilities and sense of empowerment fostering greater independence. Acquiring new knowledge and capabilities often leads to a heightened sense of autonomy and the capacity to navigate independently.
 
Core signposted/problem solved 960 general service enquiries last year. Core staff and volunteers helped 96 people a year complete difficult forms e.g. attendance allowance, blue badge disability, housing issues etc. Studies reveal that individuals who actively sought help when facing challenges exhibited a 40% increase in resilience over time compared to those who did not seek help. At Core, 192 people have been referred to Citizen’s Advice, either accessing a full “virtual” appointment or phone call – local people don’t have to wait long for an appointment and receive expert feedback in a safe space. 85% of all CA users at Core state that the service was very helpful to them. Citizen’s Advice’s own report highlights the mental health benefits of their services. At Core, we know that helping people with a problem helps them feel more empowered to make positive steps in helping themselves and research has proven that there is a direct correlation between seeking help for problems and the development of coping mechanisms suggesting that getting support enhances an individuals over all independence and wellbeing.
Core have increased and sustained volunteering opportunities for over 30 people each year. 90% of our volunteers have been with us for over 18 months and show an immense loyalty and dedication to Core. Numerous studies highlight the positive effects of volunteering on individuals and communities. For instance, one report found that volunteering is linked to lower rates of depression and increased life satisfaction among older adults.
Core provides health based activities to improve mobility and strength including Specialist Falls Prevention Training weekly, twice weekly chair based exercise, walking group and bowling. Research proves that such activities enhance muscle strength, balance and flexibility, reducing the risk of falls and promoting independence. Recent feedback from Core’s Falls Prevention group shows that 77% of the group say they feel stronger, have better balance and would know how to get up from the floor safely.
Case Study: Esther has Parkinson’s disease and finds it difficult to keep her hearing aids clean or to travel to get help or collect batteries. Core are the only collection point for batteries locally and we regularly maintain her hearing aid when she attends our Falls Prevention class. Esther struggles with her condition and Core staff and volunteers offer her emotional support. One of the highlights of our Christmas party this year, was to see Esther get up and dance. This would never have been possible before she came to Core.
Core helps 500 people annually with hearing loss be it for Ear wax removal, hearing aid battery collection or hearing aid servicing – local people save time and travel money as well as benefit from good ear health. Studies prove that improved hearing impacts relationships, cognitive function and emotional health, contributing to a better quality of life for individuals dealing with impaired hearing.
Case Study:  Core first met friends Mabel and Mave whilst delivering a community Winter Warmers project in the local shopping precinct. Despite them appearing to be grumpy, they were in fact a comedy duo! The duo attended Core to collect their warm pack and have not looked back since. Both women have had very difficult times in their lives, losing partners and children and both now live alone, Mave confessing to seeing no one for days on end. They state that they love coming to Core and have accessed many of our services including: food pantry, warm packs, tea and toast Tuesdays, Citizen’s Advice and Cost of Living Event Day where they learned how to save money on their bills. Although we like to feel we have impacted very positively on their lives, they also give back to us, raising the mood with good fun and humour and helping others feel welcome when they first encounter Core. The Core Centre charity’s objectives are to promote well-being, relieve mental health problems and isolation and loneliness, relieve poverty, advance education, training and employment opportunities and assist in the provision of any services to residents in Calverton, Woodborough, Oxton, Epperstone, Gonalston, Lowdham, and other nearby communities. Most recently, the charity has sought to help the community combat the effects of the “Cost of Living Crisis”
Core’s purpose is to support wellbeing, reduce isolation and loneliness and make people feel valued and supported within their community - a rural area with few other sources of support.
 
Gedling, according to ONS data, has below-average levels of life satisfaction and happiness, alongside a high rate for anxiety. Every endeavour undertaken by Core serves to alleviate anxiety, mitigate isolation and loneliness, and infuse joy into the community. For instance, two new members recently joined our bowling/social eating group. Their daughter, who visited from Sheffield, went out of her way to meet us and express her gratitude for what we do for local people as she had noticed a massive improvement in her mum, who has Alzheimer's', "She remembers conversations and people and says Core is the highlight of her week".  This anecdote exemplifies just one of many instances where individuals derive profound benefits from Core, often circumventing the need for intervention from mental health services or the NHS.
 
Core serves as a first point of contact—a grassroots organisation staffed by locals and volunteers who understand the needs of their community. Our impact on people's lives is tangible, as we offer a secure, nurturing space where individuals can access information, services, and activities. Core serves as an invaluable route to market for various delivery partners to reach out to marginalised groups, offering a platform to deliver services directly to people. For instance, Gedling Borough Council now utilises Core to host a weekly outreach clinic, which consistently draws a full attendance. Through discussions with our users, feedback from community groups and social media, we have identified that there is a community need for more social eating opportunities. We have therefore started a monthly lunch club project which offers a hot 2 course meal for £5. We have currently run 4 extremely successful lunch clubs for up to 65 local people, many of whom would not eat with others that week. Our survey found that 73% of attendees said it helped them get out the house, feeling less lonely. Our motto is... “Tastes better Together” This not only provides a reason for people to come together, alleviating loneliness and isolation but it leads to more engagement with all our other services, allowing us to take a holistic, whole person approach, meaning that we can build relationship and trust. From engaging with just one of our services, individuals often find assistance in resolving other issues, thereby averting the escalation of their problems and challenges. From a recent survey we know that 55% of our users go on to access 4 or more of our services.
 
Many individuals describe Core as a lifeline. Once people become engaged with us, they often acquire new skills, forge friendships, or find additional sources of assistance. One woman serves as a remarkable example of this, as expressed in her feedback: "What a godsend this place is!!! After my husband's passing, I relocated to Calverton, where my only family connection was my brother. I was a stranger to everyone else. Discovering Core through the local newsletter was a turning point. I enrolled in the exercise classes held on Tuesdays and Thursdays, took advantage of the computer classes, and booked a Citizens' Advice appointment. Through these activities, I've formed numerous friendships. The staff are exceptional; their willingness to help knows no bounds. I wholeheartedly recommend Core to anyone seeking support. I feel immensely fortunate to have access to these activities. Core truly is a wonderful place. Thank you!"
 
At Core, we prioritise listening to the local community—empowering individuals to shape our initiatives. For instance, our table tennis group emerged due to regular requests from locals and the foresight of one of our volunteers, and it has since become a well-attended club. Additionally, we remain responsive to pressing national issues. For instance, in response to the cost of living crisis, we increased our Food Pantry box offering, organised distribution of warm packs and are starting a two course meal/social eating lunch club monthly. With over 27 years of supporting the local community, the demand for our services has never been higher.
 
To ensure we remain in touch with local needs, we document daily enquiries, group activities, and trends. This data helps us refine our understanding of the community we serve. We also monitor social media comments for insights into relevant and valuable offerings. Our methods include simple survey sheets, course feedback, user and stakeholder focus groups, and a feedback book that encourages user suggestions. Furthermore, we analyse national data sources, such as ONS statistics, to gain broader insights. Regular network forums provide opportunities to gather community input and align with government and Local Authorities' strategies and policies.
A survey conducted over a six-week period with 146 participants, responses were gathered on a scale of 1 to 5:
 
- Do you feel more confident since attending Core?
    - 1 – 0
    - 2 – 0
    - 3 – 9
    - 4 – 44
    - 5 – 102
 
- Have you made new friends as a result of visiting Core?
    - 1 – 0
    - 2 – 0
    - 3 – 2
    - 4 – 40
    - 5 – 106
 
When asked if there are other local community organisations offering services similar to Core's, only seven respondents answered positively, indicating the unique value Core provides. Our aim is to offer services either free or at minimal cost, often through partnerships with facilitators who share this commitment.
Presently, Core's funding primarily comes from the National Lottery, utilising a tapered funding model. We are tasked with bridging the funding gap ourselves, which necessitates securing grants and organising fundraising activities. These grants are vital for sustaining our invaluable work in the community.
 
Please describe the project / activities that you intend to carry out*
Core is a well-established Community Hub, a unique haven of kindness and compassion, providing practical support for local people in need of help.
We are a small charity that makes a huge positive impact on local people’s lives. Our 3 staff and 30+ volunteers help Core offer over 40 different services, activities and classes, working with numerous partners throughout Nottinghamshire. These include GBC, NCC, Hear Together Charity, Citizens Advice, Green Doctor energy advice, Trussell Trust, National Grid, Calverton Parish Council ,St Johns Ambulance, Carers Association, Age UK, StandGuide, Inspire etc
As part of our services, we provide classes including crafts such as bobbin lace, card-making, knit and natter and rag rugging. Also, activities to improve health including chair-based exercise, fall prevention, meditation and relaxation sessions, ear wax removal, hearing aid clinic, table tennis; and a range of other much-needed services delivered by ourselves and partners(Gedling borough Council Outreach Clinic weekly) including help filling in complicated forms like bus pass, driving licence, blue badge, attendance allowance, support to use phones and other devices, energy-saving and debt advice. We also provide help with CVs, job seeking and confidence building. Core now runs a weekly social eating project including carpet bowls and bingo and we hold a weekly Food Pantry which offers £15/20 boxes of food for £3.50. We are a registered foodbank referral point and have noted a big increase in uptake. Our latest venture involves providing a monthly lunch club offering a hot two course meal for £5 to around 65 local people. As part of this meal, we put on speakers who can inform diners of how to access all sorts of help which they might not know about. Many live alone and it is a way to connect, eat together and make friends. 
Our project is ongoing and we would be looking for a contribution to help support us for 12 months.
 
Increasing volunteering opportunities that enable more vulnerable residents to be supported: We currently have a volunteer force of approximately 30-40 individuals and we are taking on more volunteers to run our new lunch club. Our services and activities are crafted and delivered by locals from all walks and backgrounds and all our activity leaders and volunteers come from the surrounding community. We know that volunteering has a massive positive impact on the individual themselves. Take, for instance, a lady who initially began volunteering with us to help with teas and coffees. She had recently been made unemployed and expressed that she had been struggling with her mental health after a traumatic event at work. After a short period of time, her self-esteem and sparkle emerged and she offered to run a new group for Core, mainly aimed at men, playing 5s and 3s or crib. This is new to Core and initial signs are very positive with over 10 weekly players already. Moreover, our new volunteer has grown in confidence and outlook, helping her regain a sense of purpose and usefulness.
We approach recruitment of volunteers by advertising, conducting interviews, and assigning roles based on individuals' skill sets and personalities. Our comprehensive induction program covers essential topics like safeguarding, health and safety, and an overview of Core's mission. We also offer specialised accreditation training, such as food hygiene, bereavement counselling, and carers' advocacy. It works both ways—we ensure that the partnership aligns not only with Core's needs but also with the volunteer's aspirations. Regular training and social events provide volunteers with platforms to offer feedback and ideas.  Recently, when we identified that we wanted to start a table tennis group, one of our trustee-volunteers eagerly stepped forward, putting us in contact with her ex table tennis league friend, who now runs our very successful table tennis group. When coordinating volunteers and assigning roles, we approach each individual's strengths and weaknesses with sensitivity. Not all roles suit everyone, and finding the right fit requires a delicate balance. We collaborate with volunteers to identify their motivations and strengths, recognising that this process is an art form with significant rewards.
 
Enables Nottinghamshire residents to contribute to social and cultural opportunities
Our Community members love to help out on simple appeals such entering a poetry competition in conjunction with the library, collecting toys for vulnerable children or recycle plastic containers to raise money for Macmillan's or knitting squares for Inspire College for blankets. These projects may sound small, but they give many people an honourable purpose, a valuable way to use their time and we help facilitate this through our appeals. We hold Christmas Party events (120 attendees), jubilee and coronation coffee mornings (60 at each). We help signpost and administer to local bus trips in conjunction with other organisations helping people access exciting destinations. Our extensive network of partnerships not only connect partners with the community but also extends our own reach by enabling us to offer services we could not directly deliver ourselves.
 
Encourages innovation to strengthen communities and support vulnerable residents, for example projects could include tackling digital exclusion, good neighbourhood schemes, dementia friendly communities, food / lunch clubs etc:
 
Core supports vulnerable residents through many of its activities including: helping 96 people yearly to fill in complicated forms like bus pass, driving licence, blue badge, attendance allowance. Many older people struggle with IT and we support 164 people a year to access their own phones and other devices. We do this by using one to one sessions which we find is a more powerful and useful way to do educate. 96 people a year receive access to local employment support either through Core volunteers or specialist support and advice such as Stand Guide. Local job seekers then feel confident to approach Core in the first instance in order to take the right step in helping them to successfully find a job. This job club offers help with CVs, job seeking and confidence building.
 
Core now runs a weekly social eating project including carpet bowls and bingo attended by between 15-20 people each week. We have started a monthly 2 course hot meal social eating project with up to 65 people attending monthly. We also hold a weekly Food Pantry which offers £15/20 boxes of food for £3.50 to around 45 families currently. We are a registered foodbank referral point and have noted a big increase in uptake during the cost of living crisis. 144 referrals a year are made to the local food bank and local people feel supported through difficult times. Core makes 200 appointments a year for our Ear wax removal clinic, meaning that local people save time and travel money, as well as benefit from good ear health. 192 people were referred to Citizen’s Advice last year, either accessing a full “virtual” appointment or phone call. This means local people don’t have to wait long for an appointment and receive expert feedback in a safe space. The vast majority of people express that they find this service very helpful. Core facilitates 120 appointments a year for local people to have their hearing aids serviced free of charge – users feel more confident in their hearing, raising overall well-being and they can attend locally. 12 people have been referred for Debt Advice, reducing worry and anxiety and helps people begin to make positive changes preventing further problems. 24 people a year are given initial free “Family” advice from a local solicitor – this service reduces anxiety amongst those dealing with family crisis, helping them make the first steps towards improving their situation
 
Encourages local networks where people help themselves and each other to be resilient, neighbourly and safe
Core works in conjunction with many local partners. We have an excellent collaboration with the working man's club where we are based, sharing events and promoting services amongst all our users. We hold joint events with the churches, theatre group, local charities like Bags of Blessings or knitting scarves for Ukraine or hearts from Haywood House. We attend community events like the village get together and Christmas light switch on. Core holds cost of living events, talks on power of attorney, carers events, falls prevention help etc. We are currently in talks with Nottingham Police, who have expressed a wish to hold community sessions at Core regularly to keep locals updates and alleviate any concerns they may have. Many of our class attendees break off and form separate friendship groups, looking out for and supporting one another.
Helps to address climate and environmental change. The Core Centre offers essential local services within a rural setting, alleviating the need for extensive travel. This significance was amplified during the pandemic, especially with the rise of remote work and the immediate demand for access to welfare advice, hearing aid batteries, and wellbeing services not typically available through the GP or other far away organisations. These services are conveniently situated at the Core Centre, which is located on the main bus route.
The Core Centre organises local litter picking events in conjunction with Gedling Borough Council. Over Christmas we also collected over 300 plastic tub containers for recycling, organised by our “green champion” trustee.
Moreover, we have implemented an energy-saving policy for the rooms we rent, ensuring that all staff and volunteers adhere to various procedures aimed at daily energy conservation. This includes practices such as turning off unnecessary lights and heating, maintaining heating only in occupied areas, and keeping doors closed when not in use.
Our close-knit community is well-informed about our crafting activities and generously donates resources such as wool, newspapers, crafting machines, walking aids, books, promoting upcycling and recycling as well as waste prevention.
Additionally, our Food Pantry initiative utilises food nearing its expiration date, thereby preventing food waste and offering affordable food options within walking distance for the community. This project not only addresses food insecurity but also has significant environmental benefits by diverting food from landfills.
We were grateful to receive another £10k grant from National Grid last winter to educate people on reducing energy usage and costs and providing warm packs. Our energy advice service further assists community members in adopting better energy consumption habits, contributing positively to environmental conservation efforts. Furthermore, we are proud to be registered as a warm bank, providing essential support to those in need during colder months.
Helps to improve mental health. At the Core Centre, we are guided by four overarching principles that underpin all our work: addressing loneliness and isolation, promoting physical and mental well-being, offering advice and guidance, and providing education and support. Our activities are designed to have a positive impact across these areas, with some programs specifically tailored to address certain needs.
For instance, our craft and creative activities attract an average of 60 participants per week. Engaging in these activities not only provides individuals with a meaningful outlet but also fosters new friendships and a more positive outlook on life. By combating social isolation, we effectively mitigate the risk of mental health issues. Additionally, our staff are equipped with mental health first aid training, enabling them to offer support and assistance when needed.
Many of our services and activities serve as preventative measures, reducing the necessity for individuals to seek further intervention from mental health services. Through offering interaction, learning, companionship, and a sense of purpose, we contribute to the overall well-being of our community members, helping them lead healthier and happier lives.
Helps to improve physical health. The Core Centre offers specialised Strong and Steady sessions on a weekly basis to a group of 15-20 individuals experiencing mobility challenges and helping to prevent falls. On average, this results in savings of £218 in primary, secondary, and social care costs per participant, along with an additional £285 improvement in quality of life per participant, totalling a benefit of £503 per participant. This group is so popular that we have a waiting list and are hoping to start a second weekly group.
Additionally, Core hosts two chair-based exercise groups each week, with 20-25 attendees per session. It is heart-warming to witness some of these participants not only join but also create new friendship groups who meet outside of Core now socially.
We now run a popular table tennis group, again benefiting people in bending, moving and stretching whilst having fun. Our line dancing group has gone from strength to strength with a beginners, intermediate and advanced sessions.
Helps to reduce loneliness. Reducing loneliness is a central aspect of our mission. We extend an open invitation for a friendly cup of tea and conversation to anyone, anytime. Additionally, we host a special games coffee morning and tea and toast session each week, where attendees can enjoy socialising with our befriending volunteers. Many of our weekly activities, whether it's exercising, knitting, or other pursuits, emphasise the importance of coming together over a cup of tea and engaging in meaningful conversation afterward.
Improves access to existing community-based services for the most vulnerable residents. Core serves as the initial point of contact for individuals seeking assistance.192 people were referred to Citizen's Advice last year, where they accessed either full "virtual" appointments or phone consultations promptly. This ensures that local residents don't have to endure long waits for appointments and can receive expert advice in a secure environment. The overwhelming majority of individuals express gratitude for this service, finding it immensely beneficial.
Moreover, 204 individuals participate in educational classes and training sessions at Core. These opportunities not only help them build confidence in acquiring new skills but also often lead them to explore other services we offer, enhancing their overall experience.
Additionally, 288 people annually access Gedling Borough Council Outreach services at Core. This accessible support system empowers individuals to seek help confidently without the need for extensive travel. Core staff provide valuable assistance in navigating their issues, guiding them through the necessary steps to address their concerns effectively.
All these services allow us to build trust with individuals often forging a relationship where we can go on to offer other means of support.
One of Core's guiding principles is, "If we can't help, we'll find someone who can!" Last year, we facilitated over 15,000 interactions, addressing numerous inquiries for assistance. We frequently connect individuals with various agencies and contacts to ensure they receive the support they need. These interactions often result in access to vital services and support, ultimately alleviating the strain on public services and enhancing the overall health and well-being of the community.
Provides support to communities of interest, for example rural communities or refugees. Core are presented with all sorts of problems and never turn anyone away. Whilst Core don’t specifically target working with refugees, we believe that helping families resettle will be something Core increasingly helps with as more families come to this area. Recently we have helped a refugee family of 5 integrate into the local community. Core have: registered the children for school, registered the family for the local GP and dentist, organised food parcels, sourced and put the family in touch with a qualified local volunteer who is giving them free English language lessons. We have also offered them emotional support, organised an inspection of their rented property and organised cost of living support with GBC. Our unlimited advice and help about the local area has helped them thrive and settle.

Core have an excellent reputation in the community and have been helping locals for over 25 years. We maintain a strong partnership with the local GP Practice, receiving daily referrals from them. We are frequently highlighted in their newsletter and collaborate on various health-related events. Additionally, we collaborate with the Social Prescribing team to provide holistic support to individuals.
Last year a local firm LandSmiths supported us by making us their charity of the year. This year we are Coop community charity and also the women’s team from the local golf club are promoting us and have chosen us as their charity of the year.
Gedling Borough Council acknowledges us as the primary community hub in the area, utilising our space for weekly outreach clinics, cost of living events, play forums, and more. The Parish Council is a staunch supporter of Core, actively promoting our initiatives.
Moreover, we are closely engaged with the local NHS integrated care board, and Core have served as a pop-up Covid vaccine centre, further demonstrating our commitment to public health and community well-being.                                                              


Local Insight England Custom Report
Calverton ward Coalfields Regeneration Trust 6 May 2025

Local Insight Local Insight provides instant access to the information you need for the neighbourhoods you care about. 
We bring together small-area social and demographic data in one easy to use and intuitive platform. You can explore data for any area you are interested in through maps, dashboards and reports.  
Find out more at: localinsight.org
OCSI We combine expertise in research and technology to support organisations working for social good to make evidence-based decisions. We have worked with more than 250 public and community sector organisations from local to international level. 
Our research and services are based on unrivalled knowledge and use of place-based social, economic and demographic data. 
Find out more at: ocsi.uk
About the indicators OCSI routinely collect all small-area data published by more than 50 government agencies and other reputable bodies.  We identify key indicators relevant to local authorities, grantmakers and charities to include within this report and the Local Insight platform. 
We manage and maintain all the data and provide comprehensive metadata so that you can be confident you are using the most up-to-date data.
How we have identified the area of Calverton ward This report is based on the “Calverton ward” area, created by Coalfields Regeneration Trust. The map image of the area is shown at the beginning of this report. The map imagery is provided by Google, using boundary definitions published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Statistical and geographic data are sourced from the ONS and are used under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2025].
We use sophisticated aggregation and apportioning methods to calculate the data values used in the charts and tables in this report.
Alongside data for the “Calverton ward” area, we also display data for the selected comparator areas: Nottinghamshire and England.

Contents Access and Transport

Community

Living Environment

Crime

Demographics (Older People)

Digital

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)

Economy (Economic Activity)

Economy (Income and Debt)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)

Education

Energy (Fuel Poverty and Consumption)

Health (Children)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)

Health (Mortality)

Housing (Affordability)

Housing (Characteristics)

Housing (Condition)

Population (Demographic Summary)

Population (Ethnicity)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)

Population (Migration)

Appendix: Data sources

Access and Transport The following visualisations provide data on car ownership, travel time to essential services, job access scores, food insecurity, access to health assets and on the local retail environment.
As a collection, these indicators offer insight into the disparities, challenges, and opportunities that individuals have as their accessible environment.
 
Car Ownership
The boxes below show the number and proportion of households according to their ownership of a car or van. This is based on responses to the car ownership question in the 2021 Census which asks information on the number of cars or vans owned, or are available for use, by one or more members of a household. This includes company cars and vans available for private use and is based on details for private households only. Cars or vans used by residents of communal establishments are not counted.

In Calverton ward, 14.96% of households have no access to a car or van. This is less than the proportion without access to a car or van in Nottinghamshire (18.27%) and less than the proportion without access to a car or van in England (23.54%).
 
No Car

498

14.96% (Nottinghamshire = 18.27%, England = 23.54%)

One Car

1,471

44.2% (Nottinghamshire = 41.77%, England = 41.28%)

Two Cars

1,057

31.76% (Nottinghamshire = 30.01%, England = 26.06%)

Three+ Cars

302

9.07% (Nottinghamshire = 9.95%, England = 9.12%)


Source: Census 2021

 
The bar chart below shows the numbers of households with no car or van in the 2021 Census alongside the proportions from previous Censuses to identify changes over time.

In 2021, 14.96% of households in Calverton ward had no access to a car or van. This is less than the proportion without access to a car or van in 2011 (18.98%).
 
Households With No Car or Van (2011 vs. 2021)


Source: UK Census

 
Travel Times to Key Services
The boxes and bar chart below provide data for the travel time to key services (by walking and public transport) in 2019. These figures are derived from the analysis of spatial data on public transport timetables; road, cycle and footpath networks; population and key local services. The data shows the average minimum travel time - the shortest travel time by walking and public transport, averaged over the LSOA geographical area. Where the shortest journey is by public transport, an average of five minutes is added to allow for a margin for catching the service, but if a quicker walking journey is available, this will be used with nothing added.

In Calverton ward, the average travel time to the nearest GP is 11 minutes. This is shorter than the travel time in Nottinghamshire (14 minutes) and shorter than England (13 minutes).
 
Employment Centre (>500 Jobs)

8

(Nottinghamshire = 10, England = 9)

Employment Centre (>5000 Jobs)

21

(Nottinghamshire = 16, England = 16)

Further Education Institution

12

(Nottinghamshire = 19, England = 22)


 
GP

11

(Nottinghamshire = 14, England = 13)

Hospital

47

(Nottinghamshire = 41, England = 41)

Primary School

9

(Nottinghamshire = 9, England = 9)


 
Secondary School

12

(Nottinghamshire = 18, England = 18)

Supermarket

7

(Nottinghamshire = 7, England = 7)

Town Centre

26

(Nottinghamshire = 19, England = 21)


Source: Department for Transport (DfT)

 
Travel Times to Key Services


Source: Department for Transport (DfT)

 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Geographical Barriers
The boxes below show:
The geographical barriers sub-domain rank from the Indices of Deprivation, where a lower rank corresponds to a more deprived area. This sub-domain relates to the physical proximity of local services where the score is derived from the road distances to a post office, primary school, general store or supermarket, and to a GP surgery. The underlying measures included in the above sub-domain rank - road distances to key services where each indicator is defined as an average road distance to the relevant key service, measured in kilometres and calculated initially at Output Area level. Greater distances can often indicate that an area is experiencing higher levels of deprivation through greater challenges in accessing key services.
Calverton ward has a rank of 18,873 on the 2019 Geographical Barriers Sub-Domain. This means that Calverton ward has less challenges in accessing key services relative to Nottinghamshire (14,181) and less relative to England (16,490).
 
IoD 2019 Geographical Barriers Sub-Domain Rank

18,873

(Nottinghamshire = 14,181, England = 16,490)


 
General Store or Supermarket

0.594

(Nottinghamshire = 0.807, England = 0.711)

GP Surgery

0.851

(Nottinghamshire = 1.535, England = 1.304)

Post Office

0.797

(Nottinghamshire = 1.138, England = 1.121)

Primary School

0.775

(Nottinghamshire = 0.846, England = 0.853)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Jobs Access Score
The bar chart below shows the overall Jobs Access score in 2021. This is a measure of connectivity developed by UK Onward and includes the number of jobs accessible by car and public transport across 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 90 minutes timespans. It also incorporates a “door-to-workplace” measure, including every journey stage from time spent walking to the car, driving, to parking and walking to an office - as well as average delays, timetabling and actual journey time on public transport. Together these measures form an overall Jobs Access score, the weighted average job count, combining driving and public transport. A higher score indicates greater levels of job accessibility.

In Calverton ward, the Jobs Access score is 433,600.10. This is lower than Nottinghamshire (506,223.96) and lower than England (698,519.47).
 
Jobs Access Score


Source: UK Onward

 
Priority Places for Food Index
The boxes and bar chart below show the ranks given in the 2024 Priority Places for Food Index, where a lower rank indicates higher food insecurity. This is a composite index formed of data compiled across seven different dimensions relating to food insecurity. It is constructed using open data to capture complex and multidimensional aspects of food insecurity and was initially developed in response to the 2022 cost of living crisis which has seen many communities under severe financial pressure and at an increased risk of food insecurity. The seven dimensions include:
Ecommerce Access - online groceries availability and propensity to shop online. Fuel Poverty - the proportion of households in fuel poverty and prepayment meter prevalence. Food for Families - children in relative low-income families, healthy start voucher uptake and distance to the nearest food bank. Non-Supermarket Proximity - distance to nearest non-supermarket retail food store, count of non-supermarket retail food stores within 1km, average distance to nearest market and average count of markets within 1km. Supermarket Proximity - the average distance to nearest large grocery store and the average count of stores within 1km. Supermarket Accessibility - the average travel distance to nearest large grocery store and accessibility via public transport. Socio-Demographic Barriers - the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation and the proportion of the population with no car access.
Calverton ward has a Priority Places for Food Index rank of 12,421. This means that Calverton ward has higher levels of food insecurity than Nottinghamshire (15,672) and higher levels of food insecurity than England (16,898).
 
Priority Places for Food Index

12,421

(Nottinghamshire = 15,672, England = 16,898)

Ecommerce Access

17,251

(Nottinghamshire = 14,493, England = 16,038)

Fuel Poverty

20,654

(Nottinghamshire = 17,836, England = 16,454)

Food for Families

20,521

(Nottinghamshire = 13,371, England = 16,853)


 
Non-Supermarket Proximity

9,667

(Nottinghamshire = 17,913, England = 17,154)

Supermarket Proximity

2,631

(Nottinghamshire = 15,371, England = 17,094)

Supermarket Accessibility

21,411

(Nottinghamshire = 18,443, England = 17,059)

Socio-Demographic Barriers

20,971

(Nottinghamshire = 18,648, England = 16,612)


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 
Priority Places for Food Index Dimension Ranks


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 
Access to Health Assets and Hazards
AHAH (the index of ‘Access to Health Assets and Hazards’) is a multi-dimensional index developed by the CDRC for Great Britain measuring how ‘healthy’ neighbourhoods are. This open data resource provides a valuable set of measures for researchers and policy makers with an interest in measuring the role of spatial features on health.

The bar chart below shows the AHAH access to health assets, displaying the mean distance (in minutes) to five key health assets.

In Calverton ward the average distance to an A&E hospital is 2.16 minutes. This is similar to the average distance in Nottinghamshire (2.78 minutes) and similar to the average distance in England (2.79 minutes).
 
Access to Health Assets


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 
The bar chart below shows the AHAH access to health hazards, displaying the distance (in minutes) to four key unhealthy retail offerings.

In Calverton ward the average distance to a tobacconist or vape store is 2.78 minutes. This is shorter than the average distance in Nottinghamshire (5.56 minutes) and shorter than the average distance in England (5.21 minutes).
 
Access to Health Hazards


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 

Community The following visualisations offer insight into various community measures. It includes data from the Community Needs Index, as well as measures of funding, voter turnout, charities, community & civic participation, neighbourhood cohesion and community-owned assets. This selection of data together provides a comprehensive overview of the community landscape, emphasising the factors that are contributing to the community's need.
 
Community Needs Index (CNI) Ranks
The chart below shows the overall rank on the 2023 Community Needs Index (CNI), as well as a rank on each of the three CNI domains for Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. The CNI was developed to identify areas experiencing poor community and civic infrastructure, relative isolation and low levels of participation in community life. The index was created by combining a series of 28 indicators, conceptualised under three domains: Civic Assets, Connectedness and Active and Engaged Community. A lower rank indicates that an area has relatively higher levels of need.
Civic Assets: measures the presence of key community, civic, educational and cultural assets in a close proximity of the area. These include pubs, libraries, green space, community centres, swimming pools – facilities that provide things to do often, at no or little cost, which are important to how positive a community feels about its area. Connectedness: measures the connectivity to key services, digital infrastructure, isolation and strength of the local jobs market. It looks at whether residents have access to key services, such as health services, within a reasonable travel distance. It considers how good public transport and digital infrastructure are and how strong the local job market is. Active and Engaged Community: measures the levels of third sector civic and community activity and barriers to participation and engagement. It shows whether charities are active in the area, and whether people appear to be engaged in the broader civic life of their community.
Calverton ward has an overall CNI rank of 5,501. This means that Calverton ward has higher levels of community need than Nottinghamshire (14,927) and higher levels of community need than England (17,040).
 
Community Needs Index Ranks


Source: Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) and Local Trust

 
Funding
The boxes below look at data on community funding, showing:
The combined total of grants made to local projects and organisations by the Big Lottery Fund between 2004 and 2021. Figures are presented as funding per 1,000 population. The total count of grants and the combined amount of grant funding per head from the largest national grant giving organisations whose data has been subject to the 360Giving standard. The data is based on the location of grant recipients rather than the location of beneficiaries. The date of the grants awarded fall between 1991 and Apr-2025.
The total amount awarded from major grant funders per head in Calverton ward is £157.68. This is lower than the amount of funding per head across Nottinghamshire (£1,725.71) and lower than the amount of funding per head across England (£3,595.33).

 
National Lottery Community Fund Grant Funding per 1,000 Population

£127,883.33

(Nottinghamshire = £63,419.90, England = £37,971.67)

Grants From Major Grant Funders

102.78

(Nottinghamshire = 67.40, England = 94.36)

Amount Awarded From Major Grant Funders per Head

£157.68

(Nottinghamshire = £1,725.71, England = £3,595.33)


Source: The National Lottery Community Fund/360Giving

 
The Third Sector, Charities and Community Owned Assets
The boxes below show:
The number of third sector organisations per 100,000 population in Sep-2024. This is based on location of the organisations rather than areas where they operate. It encompasses charities, social enterprises, mutuals, cooperatives, and many less formal voluntary and community organisations.  
The number of registered charities per 100,000 population in 2021. This is based on location of charities rather than areas where they operate. It encompasses registered charities only. The number of community owned assets per 100,000 population in 2023. This picks up assets inside or within 1km of the local area boundary.
Calverton ward has 289.89 third sector organisations per 100,000 population. This is lower than the number of third sector organisations per 100,000 across Nottinghamshire (346.09) and lower than the number of third sector organisations per 100,000 across England (576.22).
 
Third Sector Organisations per 100,000 Population

289.89

(Nottinghamshire = 346.09, England = 576.22)

Registered Charities per 100,000 Population

170.60

(Nottinghamshire = 223.94, England = 279.34)

Community Owned Assets per 100,000 Population

234.37

(Nottinghamshire = 650.57, England = 755.79)


Source: UK Third Sector Database / Charity Commission / Power to Change, the Community Land Trust Network, Co-operatives UK, Plunkett Foundation, Locality and Keep it in the Community

 
Civic Engagement
The boxes below shows average self-reported levels of community and civic engagement. These measures are taken from the 2017 to 2021 Community Life Survey and reflect whether individuals are working together in both political and non-political actions to protect public values or make a change in a community.

The proportion of people taking part in any civic engagement in Calverton ward is 44.2%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (44.83%) and similar to the proportion in England (45.19%).
 
Taken Part: Any Civic Engagement

44.2%

(Nottinghamshire = 44.83%, England = 45.19%)

Not Taken Part: Consultation About Local Services

18.66%

(Nottinghamshire = 19.06%, England = 19.21%)


 
Not Taken Part: Community Groups, Clubs or Organisations

63.8%

(Nottinghamshire = 65.18%, England = 64.06%)

People Who Feel They Can Influence Decision in Their Local Area

76.57%

(Nottinghamshire = 75.70%, England = 73.84%)

Engaged in Volunteering in the Last Month

63.02%

(Nottinghamshire = 63.99%, England = 63.02%)


Source: Community Life Survey

 
Neighbourhood Strength and Cohesion
The boxes below show average levels of neighbourhood strength and cohesion across Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. These measures are taken from the 2017 to 2021 Community Life Survey and reflect the residents' sense of community, engagement in acts of neighbouring, and attractiveness of living in the neighbourhood.

On average, 66.91% of residents in Calverton ward feel they do not belong very strongly to their neighbourhood. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (66.26%) and higher than the proportion in England (62.92%).
 
Disagree: People in the Neighbourhood Pull Together to Improve It

63.81%

(Nottinghamshire = 64.07%, England = 60.23%)

Uncomfortable Asking Neighbour to Keep a Set of Keys for Emergencies

68.44%

(Nottinghamshire = 68.29%, England = 62.8%)

Doesn't Feel Strong Belonging to Neighbourhood

66.91%

(Nottinghamshire = 66.26%, England = 62.92%)


 
Never Chats to Neighbours

22.93%

(Nottinghamshire = 23.53%, England = 27.16%)

Uncomfortable Asking Neighbour to Collect Shopping Essentials

57.65%

(Nottinghamshire = 57.79%, England = 53.56%)

Don't Borrow Things or Exchange Favours With Neighbours

36.92%

(Nottinghamshire = 37.79%, England = 36.13%)


Source: Community Life Survey

 

Living Environment The following series of text and charts delves into the living environment of Calverton ward, giving insight into crucial factors such as the presence of green and blue spaces, and air pollution levels. Together these indicators provide a deeper understanding of the area's environmental health, resilience, and potential for sustainable development.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Living Environment
The chart below shows the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) 2019 overall Living Environment Deprivation domain rank, as well as the two sub-domain ranks. These measure the quality of the local environment.
The 'Indoors' sub-domain measures the quality of housing and contains the following indicators: Houses without central heating: The proportion of houses that do not have central heating; Housing in poor condition: The proportion of social and private homes that fail to meet the Decent Homes standard. The 'Outdoors' sub-domain contains measures of air quality and road traffic accidents and contains the following indicators: Air quality: A measure of air quality based on emissions rates for four pollutants; Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists: A measure of road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists among the resident and workplace population.
Data shows the average LSOA rank, where a lower rank indicates that an area is experiencing higher levels of deprivation.

Calverton ward has an average rank of 27,532 on the Living Environment domain. This means that Calverton ward has lower levels of local environment deprivation relative to Nottinghamshire (21,446) and lower levels of deprivation relative to England (16,158).
 
Living Environment Ranks (IoD)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Green and Blue Spaces
The boxes below show various measures of access to green and blue spaces, including:
Green Space (Passive) - input measure for the 2024 Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) index as part of the Physical Environment domain. The figures are the Median Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) scores (-1 to 1). Values close to zero (-0.1 to 0.1) generally correspond to barren areas of rock, sand, or snow. Low, positive values represent shrub and grassland (approximately 0.2 to 0.4), while high values indicate temperate and tropical rainforests (values approaching 1). Blue Space - input measure for the 2024 Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) index as part of the Physical Environment domain. Blue spaces are water features that can be positive amenities. This indicator is based on the average drive-time to the nearest water body such as a beach, a lake and a river (in minutes). Average Distance to Nearest Park, Public Garden, or Playing Field (Metres) and Average Number of Parks, Public Gardens, or Playing Fields (Within 1,000 Metres) - data is based on analysis of the Apr-2020 Ordnance Survey (OS) data on access to private gardens, public parks and playing fields in Great Britain. Households with Access to Green Space - these statistics describe the percentage of households that are within different walking distances of different types of green space for small neighbourhoods in England in 2024. We have taken the figures published for Scenario 7. This matches criteria described in the Natural England Green Infrastructure Standards for England. Households with Private Outdoor Space - the proportion of addresses with access to private outdoor space (for both houses and flats). Data is based on analysis of Apr-2020 Ordnance Survey (OS) data on access to private gardens, public parks and playing fields in Great Britain. Tree Cover - shows the percentage of tree canopy cover at neighbourhood level in 2022. The tree canopy area is derived from Environment Agency National LiDAR Programme data with gaps filled by Forestry Commission National Forest Inventory 2020 data at 1m spatial resolution.
On average, 8.72% of households in Calverton ward have access to green space. This is lower than the proportion of households with access to green space in Nottinghamshire (18.41%) and lower than the proportion in England (23.04%).
 
Green Space (Passive)

0.45

(Nottinghamshire = 0.44, England = 0.42)

Blue Space

7.93

(Nottinghamshire = 4.58, England = 4.02)


Source: Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) Index

 
Average Distance to Nearest Park, Public Garden, or Playing Field

438.29m

(Nottinghamshire = 415.42m, England = 381.64m)

Average Number of Parks, Public Gardens, or Playing Fields (Within 1,000 Metres)

3

(Nottinghamshire = 4, England = 2)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Households With Access to Green Space

320

8.72% (Nottinghamshire = 18.41%, England = 23.04%)

Households With Private Outdoor Space

2,941

91.82% (Nottinghamshire = 93.19%, England = 88.38%)

Tree Cover

17.9%

(Nottinghamshire = 14.4%, England = 14%)


Source: Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)/Ordnance Survey/Friends of the Earth

 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Air Quality
The boxes below show modelled estimates of air quality based on the concentration of four pollutants: nitrogen dioxide, benzene, sulphur dioxide and particulates. Values for each of the pollutants were based on 2016 air quality data published by the UK Air Information Resource for 1km grid squares. A higher concentration indicates that an area is experiencing high levels of deprivation.

Calverton ward's estimated concentration of nitrogen dioxide is 0.333. This is lower than the concentration in Nottinghamshire (0.389) and lower than the concentration in England (0.430).
 
Nitrogen Dioxide

0.333

(Nottinghamshire = 0.389, England = 0.430)

Benzene

0.072

(Nottinghamshire = 0.082, England = 0.098)

Sulphur Dioxide

0.042

(Nottinghamshire = 0.045, England = 0.034)

Particulates

0.425

(Nottinghamshire = 0.425, England = 0.395)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 

Crime The following data provides insight into the recorded crime rates in an area. The data is created using the rolling 12 month total of neighbourhood-level incidents for various types of offence as a rate per 1,000 residents. The incidents were located to the point at which they occurred and allocated to the appropriate lower super output area (LSOA). This is based on data for individual crime incidents published via the Police UK open data portal  which has been linked by Local Insight to selected neighbourhoods.

Please note there can be missing data in Police.uk crime counts for certain areas. This is often due to issues with IT system changes at various police forces such as Devon and Cornwall, and Greater Manchester currently, which affects their reporting of figures to Police UK. Please see Police UK's change log for details of current known issues.
 
Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour Summary
The table below shows counts and rates for the main crime types and anti-social behaviour incidents between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

There were 461 total crime offences in Calverton ward between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025, with the overall crime rate being 60.7 per 1,000 population. This is lower than the average across Nottinghamshire (72.9) and lower than the average across England (91.1).
 
Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour Summary

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England
Total Crime
60.7
72.9
91.1

Anti-Social Behaviour
5.5
9.7
14.3

Bicycle Theft
0.1
0.5
0.9

Burglary
4.8
6.4
9.0

Criminal Damage
5.8
6.6
6.6

Drug Crime
5.0
2.1
2.8

Other Crime
3.2
2.3
2.0

Other Theft
2.3
4.8
6.4

Possession of Weapons
0.9
0.9
0.8

Public Order
3.1
4.3
6.4

Robbery
0.5
0.5
1.1

Shoplifting
4.9
10.2
7.6

Theft From Person
0.3
0.4
2.1

Vehicle Crime
1.4
3.3
5.2

Violent Crime & Sexual Offences
25.6
24.6
31.2

Source: Police UK

 
Total Crime Rate
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of criminal offences. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The overall crime rate in Calverton ward has decreased from 66.0 per 1,000 people between Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 to 60.7 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Total Crime Rate


Source: Police UK

 
Anti-social Behaviour
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of anti-social behaviour offences. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The rate in Calverton ward has decreased from 16.4 per 1,000 people between Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 to 5.5 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Anti-social Behaviour


Source: Police UK

 
Violent and Sexual Offences
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of violent and sexual offences. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The rate in Calverton ward has increased from 22.8 per 1,000 people between Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 to 25.6 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Violent and Sexual Offences


Source: Police UK

 
Burglary
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of burglary offences. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Mar-2020 to Feb-2021 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The rate in Calverton ward has increased from 3.4 per 1,000 people between Mar-2020 to Feb-2021 to 4.8 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Burglary


Source: Police UK

 
Criminal Damage and Arson
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of criminal damage and arson offences. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The rate in Calverton ward has increased from 5.5 per 1,000 people between Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 to 5.8 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Criminal Damage and Arson


Source: Police UK

 
Shoplifting
The line chart below shows a time series made up of 12-month totals of neighbourhood-level incidents of shoplifting. The figure is a rate per 1,000 residents. The first data point covers Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 and the final data point covers Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.

The rate in Calverton ward has increased from 1.7 per 1,000 people between Sep-2018 to Aug-2019 to 4.9 per 1,000 people between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025.
 
Shoplifting


Source: Police UK

 

Demographics (Older People) The following data visualisations focus on providing insight into the characteristics of the older population within Calverton ward. By analysing demographic data relating to individuals aged 65 and above, as well as insights into pension credit claimants and vulnerable pensioner households, this selection of indicators shed light on the challenges and opportunities associated with the older population.
 
Population Aged 65+
The chart below shows the proportion of the total population in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England who are aged 65+, broken down by 5-year age bands. These population figures are taken from the 2022 Office for National Statistics (ONS) Mid Year Estimates.

The overall proportion of people aged 65+ in Calverton ward is 24.88%. This is higher than the proportion of people aged 65+ in Nottinghamshire (21.42%) and higher than the proportion of those aged 65+ in England (18.61%).
 
Population Aged 65+


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Change in Population Aged 65+
The chart below shows the change in the percentage of people aged 65+ between 2011 and 2022 in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. These population figures are taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Mid Year Estimates and are presented as a proportion of the total population.

In Calverton ward the proportion of the population who are aged 65+ has increased since 2011, changing from 18.45% to 24.88%. This latest figure is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (21.42%) and higher than the proportion in England (18.61%) in 2022.
 
Change in Population Aged 65+


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Pension Credit Claimants
The boxes below look at the number and proportion of pensioners in poverty in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire, and England in Aug-2024. Pensioners in poverty are those in receipt of Pension Credit. Pension Credit provides financial help for people aged 60 or over whose income is below a certain level set by the law. The boxes break down Pension Credit claimants by sex, credit element and relationship status. There are two parts to Pension Credit: Guarantee element (which tops up a weekly income to a minimum amount) and Savings element (a small top-up for people who have a modest amount of income or savings).

106 people in Calverton ward are in receipt of Pension Credit. Of these, 69 are female and 24 are male. The proportion of those aged 65+ receiving Pension Credit in Calverton ward (5.61%) is lower than the proportion of claimants in Nottinghamshire (8.65%) and lower than the proportion of claimants in England (10.86%).

In Calverton ward, a higher proportion of Pension Credit claimants are single (74.57%) compared to those who have a partner (15.14%).
 
Pension Credit Claimants

106

5.61% (Nottinghamshire = 8.65%, England = 10.86%)

Pension Credit Claimants: Female

69

56.22% (Nottinghamshire = 58.17%, England = 56.07%)

Pension Credit Claimants: Male

24

19.75% (Nottinghamshire = 25.01%, England = 28.65%)


 
Pension Credit Claimants: Guarantee Element

40

32.48% (Nottinghamshire = 40.41%, England = 48.76%)

Pension Credit Claimants: Saving Element

20

15.95% (Nottinghamshire = 13.25%, England = 10.56%)

Pension Credit Claimants: Guarantee & Saving Element

42

33.87% (Nottinghamshire = 29.57%, England = 25.4%)


 
Pension Credit Claimants: Single

92

74.57% (Nottinghamshire = 73.21%, England = 73.96%)

Pension Credit Claimants: With Partner

19

15.14% (Nottinghamshire = 10.06%, England = 10.76%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP; Aug-2024)

 
Change in Pension Credit Claimants
The chart below shows a time series of the total percentage of Pension Credit claimants (as a proportion of all those aged 65+), giving insight into how this has changed in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England between Feb-2015 and Aug-2024.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of the population aged 65+ who are claiming Pension Credit has decreased, from 12.49% in Feb-2015 to 5.61% in Aug-2024. This latest figure is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (8.65%) and lower than the proportion in England (10.86%).
 
Change in Pension Credit Claimants


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Vulnerable Pensioner Households
The table below looks at vulnerable pensioner households, including those that may face greater risks or who may have different types of need. Here pensioner loneliness is measured by the proportion of pensioners living alone (defined as households of one pensioner and no other household members). Pensioner vulnerability is also reflected in those with bad/very bad health, a long-term illness and no access to a car/van.

There are 494 pensioners living alone in Calverton ward, 14.85% of the population aged 65+ here. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (13.77%) and higher than the proportion in England (12.81%).

Additionally, 792 pensioners in Calverton ward have bad or very bad health (44.3%). This proportion is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (44.44%) and higher than the proportion in England (42.08%).
 
One Person Household: Aged 66+

494

14.85% (Nottinghamshire = 13.77%, England = 12.81%)

Bad or Very Bad Health: Aged 65+

792

44.3% (Nottinghamshire = 44.44%, England = 42.08%)

Limiting Long-term Illness: Aged 65+

606

33.89% (Nottinghamshire = 35.18%, England = 32.83%)

No Car or Van: Lone Pensioner Households

231

46.67% (Nottinghamshire = 48.93%, England = 49.4%)


Source: Census 2021

 

Digital This selection of data visualisations present key indicators related to digital inclusion and internet usage. This includes the Digital Exclusion Risk Index (DERI) score, average broadband speeds, median data usage, rate of premises falling below the universal service obligation (USO), and the proportions within the different internet user classifications. Together these metrics offer valuable insights into the level of digital infrastructure, inclusion and skills.
 
Digital Exclusion, Broadband Speed & Use
The boxes below show digital exclusion, broadband speed and broadband use, including:
The 2021 Digital Exclusion Risk Index (DERI) score, where a higher score indicates a higher level of digital exclusion risk. This indicator explores the risk of digital exclusion at LSOA level derived from three components; age, broadband access, and deprivation. Median broadband data use - shows the median data usage (upload and download) in Gigabytes (GB) for all connections in the area. This data is collected from the 2023 Ofcom annual Connected Nations reports. Broadband download and upload speeds (Mb/s) - shows the average broadband download and upload line speeds (Mbit/s) for connections in the area. This data is collected from the 2023 Ofcom annual Connected Nations reports. Premises with broadband speeds below the Universal Service Obligation (USO) - shows the percentage of premises that do not have access to download speeds at or above the USO which equates to 10Mbit/s download speeds and upload speeds at or above 1Mbit/s. The Universal Service Obligation (USO) aims to improve broadband availability by giving homes and businesses the legal right to request a decent and affordable broadband connection. People who do not have access to a decent service will be able to request one under the USO. We can understand data values with 0% as no premises below the USO identified. This data is collected from the 2023 Ofcom annual Connected Nations reports.
In Calverton ward, the Digital Exclusion Risk Index (DERI) score is 2.87. This means that Calverton ward has a lower level of digital exclusion risk than Nottinghamshire (3.03) and has a lower level than England (3.00).
 
Digital Exclusion Risk Index (DERI) Score

2.87

(Nottinghamshire = 3.03, England = 3.00)


Source: Greater Manchester Office of Data Analytics (2021)

 
Median Broadband Data Use (GB)

316.12GB

(Nottinghamshire = 331.06GB, England = 369.19GB)

Broadband Download Speed (Mb/s)

172.08Mb/s

(Nottinghamshire = 164.43Mb/s, England = 152.10Mb/s)

Broadband Upload Speed (Mb/s)

17.72Mb/s

(Nottinghamshire = 18.81Mb/s, England = 26.73Mb/s)

Premises With Broadband Speeds Below the USO

19

0.53% (Nottinghamshire = 0.08%, England = 0.12%)


Source: Ofcom

 
Internet User Classifications (IUC)
The bar chart below shows the classification of neighbourhoods in terms of how they interact with the internet. The Internet User Classification (IUC) is a bespoke classification that identifies population profiles of internet use and engagement at LSOA level, providing insights into how people interact with the internet in a variety of ways.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of people living in areas falling within the category “e-Withdrawn” is 0%, compared to 0% living in areas falling into the category "e-Cultural Creators".
 
Internet User Classifications (IUC)


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 
Digital Propensity Index
The chart below shows the Digital Propensity Index (DPI) score in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England.

The DPI is a measure developed by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to assess how likely households in different areas of England and Wales are to engage with digital services, particularly in the context of responding to the Census online. The Census 2021 online share of returns is calculated as the number of household addresses within an LSOA that submitted a census questionnaire online as a percentage of all household addresses that submitted a census questionnaire. Where multiple questionnaires were received for a single household address, the mode of the first questionnaire received is used.

In Calverton ward, the Digital Propensity Index (DPI) score is 94.31%. This means that Calverton ward has a higher level of digital propensity than Nottinghamshire (93.63%) and has a higher level than England (94.19%).
 
Digital Propensity Index Score


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income) The following data focuses on deprivation and low incomes within Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, exploring a range of different indicators from the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) income deprivation domain and from DWP benefit claimant data. These visualisations provide insight into the nature and extent of poverty in these areas and to identify where targeted intervention and support may be required.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Income Domain
The bar chart below shows the proportion of people living in neighbourhoods grouped into deciles according to level of deprivation derived from the IoD (income domain). A higher score on the IoD (income domain) indicates that an area is experiencing greater levels of deprivation relating to low income. To clarify, all neighbourhoods in England are grouped into ten equal sized groups “deciles”; neighbourhoods in decile 1 fall within the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally, whilst neighbourhoods in decile 10 fall within the least deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally.

The definition of low income used by the IoD includes both those people that are out-of-work and those that are in work but who have low earnings (and who satisfy the respective means tests). The following indicators are included: Adults and children in Income Support families; Adults and children in income-based Jobseeker's Allowance families; Adults and children in income-based Employment and Support Allowance families Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families; Adults and children in Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit families not already counted that is those who are not in receipt of Income Support income-based Jobseeker's Allowance income-based Employment and Support Allowance or Pension Credit (Guarantee) and whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefit) is below 60% of the median before housing costs; Adults and children in Universal Credit families where no adult is in 'Working - no requirements' conditionality regime; Asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support accommodation support or both.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Income Domain


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Benefit Claimants
The boxes below show the count and proportion of people receiving Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) benefits in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. The data is provided for three age groups: 16-64, 16-24 and 65+. DWP Benefits are payable to eligible people who need additional financial support due to low income, worklessness, poor health, caring responsibilities, bereavement or disability. The following benefits are included: Universal Credit. Bereavement Benefit, Carers Allowance, Incapacity Benefit/Severe Disablement Allowance, Income Support, Jobseekers Allowance, Pension Credit and Widows Benefit. The aim of these is to provide statistics on the number of individuals claiming a DWP benefit in total (i.e. only counting each individual claimant once).

In Calverton ward, 25.29% of people aged 16-64 are claiming DWP benefits. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (23.78%) and higher than the proportion in England (23.66%).

Note: The benefit combinations are recorded as quarterly snapshots. They do not cover every possible combination.
 
Benefit Claimants: Aged 16-64

1,089

25.29% (Nottinghamshire = 23.78%, England = 23.66%)

Benefit Claimants: Aged 16-24

116

20.19% (Nottinghamshire = 17.11%, England = 14.52%)

Benefit Claimants: Aged 65+

627

33.2% (Nottinghamshire = 32.89%, England = 31.64%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP; Aug-2024)

 
The line graph below shows a time series for the proportion of working age people receiving DWP benefits in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. Working age DWP Benefits are benefits payable to all people aged 16-64 who need additional financial support due to low income, worklessness, poor health, caring responsibilities, bereavement or disability.

In Calverton ward the proportion of people aged 16-64 claiming DWP benefits has increased, from 14.94% in May-2018 to 25.29% in Aug-2024. This latest figure is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (23.78%) and higher than the proportion in England (23.66%).
 
Benefit Claimants: Aged 16-64


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Universal Credit Claimants
The visualisations below provide insight into Universal Credit (UC) claimants. It shows the count and proportion of claimants within the area for each UC conditionality regime in Mar-2025.

For context, UC provides a single payment based upon the circumstances of the household to provide support for housing costs, children and childcare costs with additions for disabled people and carers. The following benefits will be abolished as UC rolls out: Income-based Jobseekers Allowance, Income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income Support, Working Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit and Housing Benefit. The main differences between UC and the previous welfare system are: UC is available to people who are in work and on a low income, as well as to those who are out-of-work, Most people will now apply online and manage their claim through an online account, UC will be responsive as people on low incomes move in and out of work, they will get ongoing support. Most claimants on low incomes will still be paid UC when they first start a new job or increase their part-time hours. Claimants will receive a single monthly household payment, paid into a bank account in the same way as a monthly salary, support with housing costs will usually go direct to the claimant as part of their monthly payment.

In Calverton ward, 18.02% of people are claiming UC. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (16.91%) and lower than the proportion in England (18.51%).
 
Universal Credit Claimants

776

18.02% (Nottinghamshire = 16.91%, England = 18.51%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP; Mar-2025)

 
Universal Credit Claimants by Conditionality Regime

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: No work requirements
368
8.54%
39,217
7.71%
2,790,943
7.77%

Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Planning for work
10
0.23%
1,138
0.22%
91,122
0.25%

Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Preparing for work
31
0.72%
4,562
0.90%
319,817
0.89%

Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Searching for work
120
2.79%
15,568
3.06%
1,489,715
4.15%

Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Working (No requirements)
150
3.49%
15,845
3.12%
1,130,435
3.15%

Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Working (With requirements)
62
1.43%
9,639
1.90%
824,328
2.30%

Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Households on Universal Credit
The visualisations below offers further insight into Universal Credit claims by showing the total number and proportion of households on UC in Nov-2024. This is then further broken down into relevant sub-categories.

In Calverton ward, 2.22% of households are on UC and receiving the disabled child entitlement. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (1.74%) and higher than the proportion in England (1.82%).
 
Households on Universal Credit

615

18.47% (Nottinghamshire = 19.31%, England = 22.76%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP; Nov-2024)

 
Households on Universal Credit by Type

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Households on Universal Credit, Family type, single with dependent children
247
7.42%
25,348
7.10%
1,893,002
8.08%

Households on Universal Credit, Carer Entitlement
121
3.63%
12,192
3.41%
838,961
3.58%

Households on Universal Credit, Child Entitlement
348
10.45%
34,188
9.57%
2,559,483
10.92%

Households on Universal Credit (Disabled Child Entitlement)
74
2.22%
6,200
1.74%
425,722
1.82%

Households on Universal Credit (Limited Capability for Work Entitlement)
160
4.82%
20,239
5.67%
1,438,349
6.14%

Households on Universal Credit with Housing Entitlement
352
10.58%
40,506
11.34%
3,348,841
14.29%

Households on Universal Credit, Housing Entitlement, Social rented
195
5.85%
20,922
5.86%
1,783,622
7.61%

Households on Universal Credit, Housing Entitlement, Private rented
149
4.48%
18,502
5.18%
1,469,218
6.27%

Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Housing Benefit Claimants
The line chart below shows a time series of housing benefit (HB) claimants. This is the proportion of households receiving HB which can be claimed by a person if they are living on a low income and are liable to pay rent.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of households claiming Housing Benefit has decreased, from 8.68% in Jan-2020 to 3.48% in Nov-2024. This latest figure is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (5.77%) and lower than the proportion in England (7.14%).
 
Housing Benefit Claimants


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 

Economy (Economic Activity) The following selection of data visualisations present key indicators related to economic activity from the most recent UK Census. These indicators encompass various aspects of employment status, including part-time, full-time, and self-employed, as well as different classifications of economically active or inactive individuals. Additionally, there is data on working hours distribution among adults and the proportions of adults in different occupational groups. The combination of these indicators provide a valuable insight into notable trends and patterns for informing policy decisions related to workforce development and planning.
 
Employment Type
The chart below shows the percentage of part-time, full-time and self-employed people in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. Figures reflect responses to the 2021 Census economic activity question and are presented as a proportion of people aged 16+ in each respective area. Working part-time is defined as working 30 hours or less a week, full-time as working 31 hours or more a week, and being self-employed relates to the person's main job in the week before Census or, if not working in the week before Census, their last main job.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of those in full-time roles is 34.47%, which is lower than Nottinghamshire (35.18%) and higher than England (34.27%).
 
Employment Type


Source: Census 2021

 
Employment Status
The boxes below show the number and percentage of people in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire, England by employment status (excluding those who are in employment). Figures reflect responses to the 2021 Census economic activity question and are presented as a proportion of people aged 16+ in each respective area.
 
Economically Active: Unemployed

111

1.78% (Nottinghamshire = 2.2%, England = 2.85%)

Economically Active: Full-time Student

73

1.17% (Nottinghamshire = 1.66%, England = 2.3%)

Economically Inactive: Retired

1,769

28.39% (Nottinghamshire = 25.45%, England = 21.48%)


 
Economically Inactive: Student

182

2.92% (Nottinghamshire = 4.02%, England = 5.64%)

Economically Inactive: Looking After Home/Family

200

3.21% (Nottinghamshire = 3.9%, England = 4.8%)

Economically Inactive: Long-term Sick/Disabled

231

3.71% (Nottinghamshire = 4.38%, England = 4.07%)

Economically Inactive: Other

134

2.15% (Nottinghamshire = 2.68%, England = 3.14%)


Source: Census 2021

 
Working Hours
The boxes below show data on the number of hours adults aged 16+ work per week. Figures are based on self-reported responses from the 2021 Census.

The proportion of those working 49 hours or more in Calverton ward is 9.54%, which is lower than Nottinghamshire (10.69%) and lower than England (11.08%).
 
Part-time: < 15 Hours

346

9.65% (Nottinghamshire = 9.29%, England = 10.34%)

Part-time: 16-30 Hours

783

21.85% (Nottinghamshire = 19.85%, England = 19.47%)

Full-time: 31-48 Hours

2,113

58.96% (Nottinghamshire = 60.17%, England = 59.11%)

Full-time: 49+ Hours

342

9.54% (Nottinghamshire = 10.69%, England = 11.08%)


Source: Census 2021

 
Occupational Groups
The table below provides figures for the number of people in employment (aged 16+) within various types of occupational groups. An individual's occupation group is determined by their response to the occupation questions in the 2021 Census.
 
Occupational Groups

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Managers, Directors & Senior Officials
401
11.19%
48,060
12.42%
3,403,916
12.89%

Professional
597
16.66%
73,161
18.91%
5,356,649
20.29%

Associate Professional & Technical
463
12.92%
47,807
12.36%
3,499,749
13.25%

Administrative & Secretarial
350
9.77%
35,016
9.05%
2,446,565
9.27%

Skilled Trades
508
14.17%
42,887
11.08%
2,683,139
10.16%

Caring, Leisure & Other Service
410
11.44%
36,468
9.43%
2,447,148
9.27%

Sales & Customer Service
280
7.81%
29,304
7.57%
1,972,553
7.47%

Process, Plant & Machine Operatives
207
5.78%
30,244
7.82%
1,832,666
6.94%

Elementary
368
10.27%
43,961
11.36%
2,762,829
10.46%

Source: Census 2021

 
The stacked bar chart below focuses on those people within the managers, professionals and associate professional occupation groups which when combined reflect a hierarchy of roles in terms of responsibility, skill level, and decision-making authority. Managers and directors oversee the operations, professionals contribute expertise, and associate professionals provide support and technical assistance within their respective fields.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of those in the managers, directors and senior officials occupational group is 11.19%, which is lower than Nottinghamshire (12.42%) and lower than England (12.89%).
 
Managers, Professionals and Associate Professionals


Source: Census 2021

 

Economy (Income and Debt) The following collection of data visualisations focus on indicators related to income and debt. It contains data from key metrics including; household income, mortgage debt, SME borrowing debt, and unsecured personal debt. Together these indicators offer valuable insight into the financial landscape and the relationship between income distribution and debt burdens. This data can support policymakers and stakeholders to make informed decisions for fostering sustainable economic growth and enhancing financial stability of communities.
 
Household Income
The boxes below show measures of household income, including:
The average total annual household income estimate. This is the sum of the gross income of every member of the household, plus any income from benefits such as Working Families Tax Credit. The average net annual household income estimate. Net annual household income is the sum of the net income of every member of the household. This includes income tax payments; national insurance contributions; domestic rates/council tax; contributions to occupational pension schemes; all maintenance and child support payments, which are deducted from the income of the person making the payments; and parental contribution to students living away from home. The average net annual household income estimate (equivalised to take into account variations in household size) before housing costs are taken into account. The average net annual household income estimate (equivalised to take into account variations in household size) after housing costs are taken into account. These housing costs include rent (gross of housing benefit); water rates, community water charges and council water charges; mortgage interest payments (net of any tax relief); structural insurance premiums (for owner occupiers); and ground rent and service charges.
Note: All figures are model-based small area income estimates.

In Calverton ward, the average net annual household income estimate is £33,000, which is higher than the average net household income in Nottinghamshire (£32,309) and lower than in England (£35,707).

 
Total Annual Household Income Estimate

£41,400

(Nottinghamshire = £41,733, England = £47,125)

Net Annual Household Income Estimate

£33,000

(Nottinghamshire = £32,309, England = £35,707)

Net Annual Household Income (Before Housing Costs)

£29,900

(Nottinghamshire = £29,826, England = £32,797)

Net Annual Household Income Estimate (After Housing Costs)

£28,500

(Nottinghamshire = £28,087, England = £29,614)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Debt
The boxes below focus on different types of debt to provide a comprehensive understanding of borrowing patterns, financial risks, and economic conditions. Data is from Sep-2021 and has been modelled from postcode sector to Output Areas (OAs) using a weighted look-up built from the numbers of shared postcodes between a postcode sector and OA in combination with the relevant numerator per OA. The debt below includes:
Mortgage debt per household - the total amount of borrowing outstanding on customer accounts for residential mortgages, divided by the total number of households (according to the 2021 Census). SME lending debt per person aged 18+ - the total amount of borrowing outstanding on customer accounts for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SME) lending, divided by the population aged 18+ (according to the 2021 ONS Mid-Year Estimates) Personal debt (unsecured loans) per person aged 18+ - the total amount of borrowing outstanding on customer accounts for unsecured personal loans, divided by the population aged 18+ (according to the 2021 ONS Mid-Year Estimates)
In Sep-2021, the average mortgage debt per household in Calverton ward was £32,669, which is higher than the average mortgage debt in Nottinghamshire (£30,601) and lower than the average in England (£43,138).
 
Mortgage Debt (per Household)

£32,669

(Nottinghamshire = £30,601, England = £43,138)

SME Lending Debt (per Person aged 18+)

£1,818

(Nottinghamshire = £1,538, England = £2,066)

Personal Debt (per Person aged 18+)

£699

(Nottinghamshire = £643, England = £566)


Source: UK Finance (Sep-2021)

 
The line chart below provides a time series for comparison of personal debt (unsecured loans) over time.

In Sep-2021, people in Calverton ward had on average £699 of personal debt. This has decreased since Mar-2017, when Calverton ward had £856 of personal debt per person. The latest figure for Calverton ward is higher than Nottinghamshire (£643) and higher than England (£566).
 
Change in Personal Debt (Unsecured Loans)


Source: UK Finance

 

Economy (Jobs and Businesses) The following visualisations offer insight into various data relating to jobs and businesses. They include measures of job density, as well as the proportion of businesses broken down by employment size band, sector, industry and turnover. This selection of data together provides a comprehensive overview of an area's economic landscape.
 
Jobs Density
The chart below shows a time series of job density between 2009 and 2023 across Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. Jobs density reflects the number of jobs located in the local area as a ratio of the working age population in that area. Data is taken from the Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) of approximately 80,000 businesses and weighted to represent all sectors of the UK economy.

In Calverton ward, the jobs density has remained stable, from 0.43 in 2009 to 0.49 in 2023. This latest figure is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.65) and similar to the proportion in England (0.79).

The BRES definition of an employee is anyone working on the BRES reference date who is aged 16 years or over that the contributor directly pays from its payroll(s), in return for carrying out a full-time or part-time job or being on a training scheme.
 
Jobs Density


Source: Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)

 
Full-Time and Part-Time Jobs
The chart below shows the number (rounded to the nearest 1,000) and proportion of all employee jobs that are full-time and part-time. Data is taken from the 2023 Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) of approximately 80,000 businesses and weighted to represent all sectors of the UK economy.

There are approximately 1,315 full-time jobs and 689 part-time jobs in Calverton ward. The proportion of full-time jobs in Calverton ward (69.55%) is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (65.3%) and similar to the proportion in England (69.16%).
 
Full-Time and Part-Time Jobs


Source: Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)

 
Public and Private Sector Jobs
The chart below shows the proportion of employee jobs that are in the public and private sector in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. Data is taken from the 2023 Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) of approximately 80,000 businesses and weighted to represent all sectors of the UK economy. Public and private sector are defined legally, according to where the control of the business lies, rather than by ownership or whether or not the entity is publicly financed. This classification is determined by National Accounts, is in line with the European System of Accounts, and is widely considered to be the definitive definition.

83.37% of the jobs in Calverton ward are private sector employee jobs. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (82.15%) and similar to the proportion in England (82.46%).
 
Public and Private Sector Jobs


Source: Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)

 
Jobs by Industry
The table below shows the counts and proportions of employee jobs, broken down by broad industry group, across Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. Data is taken from the 2023 Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) and industry groups are classified to the 2007 revision to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC).

The proportion of professional, scientific and technical jobs in Calverton ward is 2.28%. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (5.85%) and lower than the proportion in England (9.36%).
 
Jobs by Industry

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Accomodation & Food
146
6.90%
24,500
7.45%
2,156,000
7.63%

Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing
1
0.03%
1,805
0.55%
142,000
0.50%

Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
138
6.53%
12,250
3.72%
1,244,000
4.40%

Business Administration & Support
46
2.18%
24,500
7.45%
2,442,000
8.64%

Construction
164
7.75%
18,250
5.55%
1,298,000
4.60%

Education
380
17.90%
26,500
8.05%
2,351,000
8.32%

Financial & Insurance
0
0.00%
3,075
0.93%
947,000
3.35%

Health
376
17.73%
50,000
15.20%
3,713,000
13.14%

Information & Communication
21
0.98%
9,650
2.93%
1,310,000
4.64%

Manufacturing
211
9.94%
40,000
12.16%
2,036,000
7.21%

Mining, Quarrying & Utilities
0
0.00%
3,475
1.06%
304,000
1.08%

Motor Trades
56
2.66%
7,000
2.13%
472,000
1.67%

Professional, Scientific & Technical
48
2.28%
19,250
5.85%
2,644,000
9.36%

Property
32
1.51%
4,250
1.29%
536,000
1.90%

Public Administration & Defence
1
0.06%
12,900
3.92%
1,199,000
4.24%

Retail
106
5.02%
26,500
8.05%
2,253,000
7.98%

Transport & Storage
20
0.94%
20,750
6.31%
1,400,000
4.96%

Wholesale
237
11.16%
13,500
4.10%
1,048,000
3.71%

Source: Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)

 
VAT Business Units
The time series below shows the number of VAT based local business units per 10,000 working age population between 2011 and 2024. Local business units refer to a business enterprise or part of a business enterprise (e.g. a workshop, factory, warehouse, office, mine or depot) situated in a geographically identified place (e.g. where the business is located rather than the legal head office). The count of VAT registered local business units is taken from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR), presented in the 2024 Business Activity, Size and Location publication from the ONS.

In 2024 there were 695.39 VAT based local business units per 10,000 people in Calverton ward. This is higher than the number in Nottinghamshire (637.38) and lower than the number in England (761.69). Additionally, the number of business units has increased in Calverton ward, changing from 545.9 in 2011.
 
VAT Business Units


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
VAT Business Units (By Number of Employees)
The boxes below show the number and proportion of VAT business units in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England broken down by number of employees: 0-49 people (small enterprises), 50-249 people (medium enterprises) and 250+ people (large enterprises). Local business units refer to a business enterprise or part of a business enterprise (e.g. a workshop, factory, warehouse, office, mine or depot) situated in a geographically identified place (e.g. where the business is located rather than the legal head office). The count of VAT registered local business units is taken from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR), presented in the 2024 Business Activity, Size and Location publication from the ONS.
 
Small Enterprises (0-49 People)

300

100% (Nottinghamshire = 96.94%, England = 96.99%)

Medium Enterprises (50-249 People)

8

2.74% (Nottinghamshire = 2.67%, England = 2.61%)

Large Enterprises (250+ People)

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 0.42%, England = 0.4%)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS; 2024)

 
VAT Business Units (By Sector)
The chart below shows the number of VAT based local business units per 10,000 population in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, broken down by sector. Local business units refer to a business enterprise or part of a business enterprise (e.g. a workshop, factory, warehouse, office, mine or depot) situated in a geographically identified place (e.g. where the business is located rather than the legal head office). The count of VAT registered local business units is taken from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR), presented in the 2024 Business Activity, Size and Location publication from the ONS.

The number of private business units per 10,000 people in Calverton ward is 666.82. This is higher than the number in Nottinghamshire (614.57) and lower than the number in England (743.35).
 
VAT Business Units (By Sector)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
VAT Business Units (By Industry)
The table below shows the number and proportion of VAT based local business units in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, broken down by industry. The count of VAT registered local business units is taken from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR), presented in the 2024 Business Activity, Size and Location publication from the ONS.
 
VAT Business Units (By Industry)

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
25
8.22%
2,110
6.51%
186,605
6.82%

Business Administration & Support
21
6.85%
2,690
8.30%
239,460
8.75%

Construction
45
15.07%
4,730
14.60%
341,155
12.47%

Education
8
2.74%
835
2.58%
66,460
2.43%

Health
21
6.85%
2,040
6.30%
147,585
5.39%

Accommodation & Food
16
5.48%
2,070
6.39%
187,330
6.85%

Motor Trades
8
2.74%
1,205
3.72%
78,995
2.89%

Information & Communication
4
1.37%
1,340
4.14%
180,330
6.59%

Manufacturing & Production
25
8.22%
1,860
5.74%
122,270
4.47%

Professional, Scientific & Technical
37
12.33%
3,845
11.87%
392,950
14.36%

Property & Business
21
6.85%
1,180
3.64%
116,535
4.26%

Public Administration
4
1.37%
315
0.97%
18,945
0.69%

Retail
21
6.85%
3,300
10.18%
258,535
9.45%

Transport
8
2.74%
1,500
4.63%
116,870
4.27%

Wholesale
8
2.74%
1,235
3.81%
106,200
3.88%

Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
VAT Based Enterprises (By Turnover)
The table below shows the number and proportion of VAT based enterprises in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, broken down by turnover. The count of VAT registered local business units is taken from the Inter-Departmental Business Register (IDBR), presented in the 2024 Business Activity, Size and Location publication from the ONS.

The proportion of businesses with a turnover of £0 to £49,000 in Calverton ward is 13.85%. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (12.62%) and similar to the proportion in England (13.82%).

In contrast, the proportion of businesses with a turnover of £5,000,000+ in Calverton ward is 1.54%. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (2.61%) and lower than the proportion in England (2.93%).
 
£0 to £49,000

37

13.85% (Nottinghamshire = 12.62%, England = 13.82%)

£50,000 to £99,000

45

16.92% (Nottinghamshire = 21.45%, England = 19.89%)

£100,000 to £249,000

98

36.92% (Nottinghamshire = 32.38%, England = 32.34%)


 
£250,000 to £499,000

33

12.31% (Nottinghamshire = 14.44%, England = 14.1%)

£500,000 to £999,0000

21

7.69% (Nottinghamshire = 8.5%, England = 8.59%)

£1,000,000 to £4,999,000

25

9.23% (Nottinghamshire = 7.97%, England = 8.34%)

£5,000,000+

4

1.54% (Nottinghamshire = 2.61%, England = 2.93%)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS; 2024)

 
Gross Value Added (GVA)
The bar chart below shows the 2022 Gross Value Added (GVA) per capita. This can be understood as GVA per head, or GVA divided by the population. It is commonly used to assess the economic performance and standard of living of a region or country. It makes it possible to compare the economic output across different regions or time periods, taking into account the size of the population.

In Calverton ward, the GVA per head estimate is £13,992, which is lower than Nottinghamshire (£21,495) and lower than England (£33,973).
 
Gross Value Added (GVA)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness) The issue of unemployment and worklessness is a complex and multifaceted one that can have significant impacts on individuals, families, and communities. Understanding the extent and nature of these challenges is essential for policymakers, community leaders, and residents who are committed to promoting economic growth and social inclusion. The following data focuses on this issue of unemployment and wider worklessness within Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, exploring a range of different data points to provide insight into the local areas, and to support the identification of potential interventions or support mechanisms that can help to address these challenges.
 
IoD Employment Domain
The box below shows the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) score for the Employment Deprivation domain. It measures the proportion of the working age population in an area involuntarily excluded from the labour market as a proportion of the working age population. This includes people who would like to work but are unable to do so due to unemployment, sickness, disability, or caring responsibilities.

In Calverton ward the IoD score for 2015-2016 identified 9.37% of working age people being involuntarily excluded from the labour market. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (10.32%) and lower than the proportion in England (9.9%).

Note: The following indicators are included in the score; Claimants of Jobseeker's Allowance (both contribution-based and income-based) women aged 18 to 59 and men aged 18 to 64; Claimants of Employment and Support Allowance aged 18 to 59 / 64; Claimants of Incapacity Benefit aged 18 to 59 / 64; Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance aged 18 to 59 / 64; Claimants of Carer's Allowance aged 18 to 59 / 64; Claimants of Universal Credit in the 'Searching for work' and 'No work requirements' conditionality groups. A higher score indicates that an area is experiencing high levels of deprivation.
 
IoD 2019 Employment Rate

9.37%

(Nottinghamshire = 10.32%, England = 9.9%)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
For further insight, the bar chart below shows the proportion of people living in neighbourhoods grouped into deciles according to level of deprivation derived from the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Employment Deprivation domain. To clarify, all neighbourhoods in England are grouped into ten equal sized groups “deciles”; neighbourhoods in decile 1 fall within the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally, whilst neighbourhoods in decile 10 fall within the least deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally.

0% of people in Calverton ward fall within the the first decile on the Employment Deprivation domain.
 
IoD 2019 Employment Domain Deciles


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Out of Work Benefits
The line chart below is a time series showing the total benefit combinations for individuals that claim out of work benefits as a proportion of the working age population and the changes over time. Please note this indicator is part of a temporary measure and is experimental in format. Out of work benefits are defined as being on at least one of the following benefits: Jobseekers Allowance (JSA), Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), Incapacity Benefit (IB), Severe Disablement Allowance (SDA), Income Support (IS) where Carers Allowance (CA) not also in payment, Pension Credit (PC) where Carers Allowance (CA) and Universal Credit (UC) conditionality regime is one of Searching for Work, Preparing for Work or Planning for Work. The categories of this field are mutually exclusive and therefore can be summed without double counting. Claimants may or may not be additionally in receipt of other benefits not listed here.

14.78% of the working age population were claiming out of work benefits in Calverton ward in Aug-2024. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (14.47%) and similar to the proportion in England (14.86%).
 
Out of Work Benefits


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
People Out of Work
The boxes below show a snapshot from Mar-2025 of the number and proportion of people receiving benefits payable to people who are unemployed receiving either Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) or Universal Credit (UC) for those who are out of work. It then further divides this into age/sex related subcategories. This has replaced the number of people claiming JSA as the headline indicator of the number of people claiming benefits principally for the reason of being unemployed and is sometimes referred to as the monthly claimant count. JSA is payable to people under pensionable age who are out of work and available for, and actively seeking, work of at least 40 hours a week.

In Calverton ward, 3.37% of the working age population are claiming unemployment benefits (Jobseekers Allowance and out of work UC claimants). This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (3.27%) and lower than the proportion in England (4.34%).

Note: There are differences in conditionality rules and eligibility criteria between UC and JSA. The phased roll-out of UC across the country, means that these differences in eligibility and conditionality affect geographical places differentially depending on how advanced the roll out is in that area. Until UC is fully rolled out, it is not possible to get a consistent measure of unemployment benefit claimant rate. Furthermore, the UC 'searching for work' conditionality group includes some individuals who would not have been previously eligible for JSA under the old benefits system e.g. those with work limiting illness awaiting a Work Capability Assessment.
 
Unemployment Benefit Claimants: Aged 18-24

25

5.94% (Nottinghamshire = 6.12%, England = 5.72%)

Unemployment Benefit Claimants: Aged 50+

40

1.16% (Nottinghamshire = 1.02%, England = 1.68%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Unemployment Benefit Claimants

145

3.37% (Nottinghamshire = 3.27%, England = 4.34%)

Unemployment Benefit Claimants: Male

85

4.07% (Nottinghamshire = 3.75%, England = 4.88%)

Unemployment Benefit Claimants: Female

60

2.7% (Nottinghamshire = 2.81%, England = 3.83%)


 
The line chart below offers further insight from this indicator by showing the proportion of people receiving unemployment benefits as a time series visualisation. 3.37% of the working age population in Calverton ward were claiming unemployment benefits (JSA and out of work UC claimants) as of Mar-2025. This is an increase from the 1.28% within Calverton ward in Jan-2015.
 
Unemployment Benefit Claimants


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
The line chart below is a time series showing the proportion of young people receiving JSA Jobseekers Allowance (JSA) or Universal Credit (UC) for those who are out of work (in the 'searching for work' conditionality group) aged 18-24 (as a % of all 18-24 year olds). 5.94% of 18-24 year olds in Calverton ward were claiming unemployment benefits as of Mar-2025. This is an increase from the 3.69% within Calverton ward in Nov-2016.
 
Unemployment Benefit Claimants: Aged 18-24


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Universal Credit Health Caseload
The boxes below show the number and proportion of people claiming Universal Credit for mental/physical health conditions or disabilities in Dec-2024, broken down by the stage of their health journey. When a customer makes a claim for Universal Credit they will be asked if they have a condition or disability which prevents, or limits, their ability to work. When claimants declare they have a restricted ability to work due to their health condition and DWP receives medical evidence in support of the claim - the claimant is placed on UC health. This will include cases where claimants are in work but report a health condition which limits the amount of work they can do. The number of people on UC health comprises those with a restricted ability to work supported by acceptable medical evidence (pre-WCA) or with an LCW/LCWRA outcome.

In Calverton ward, 5.28% of the working age population are on a Universal Credit health journey. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (5.64%) and lower than the proportion in England (5.73%).
 
UC Health Journey: Total

227

5.28% (Nottinghamshire = 5.64%, England = 5.73%)


 
UC Health Journey Stage: Live Fit Note (Pre-WCA)

12

0.28% (Nottinghamshire = 0.63%, England = 0.81%)

UC Health Journey Stage: Limited Capability for Work

37

0.86% (Nottinghamshire = 0.94%, England = 0.85%)

UC Health Journey Stage: Limited Capability for Work & Work Related Activity

171

3.98% (Nottinghamshire = 4.07%, England = 4.07%)

Terminally Ill UC Claimants

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 0.03%, England = 0.03%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Self-Reported Worklessness
The chart below shows indicators of self-reported worklessness derived from responses to the economic activity questions in the 2021 Census. It includes the rates of; of adults aged 16+ who are economically active but unemployed and the proportion of adults aged 16+ who are economically inactive due to either a long term sickness or disability, retirement, looking after their home/family or for other reasons. Economic activity relates to whether or not a person was working or looking for work in the week before the Census.

In Calverton ward, 1.78% of the working age population self reported as unemployed. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (2.2%) and lower than the proportion in England (2.85%).
 
Self-Reported Worklessness


Source: Census 2021

 

Education The following data visualisations are focused on the subject of education. It brings together indicators on qualification levels, participation in higher education, numbers of full-time students, and data from the Indices of Deprivation education domain. Together this collection provides insight into educational disparities and supports the identification of communities that may be falling behind and in need of support.
 
Level of Qualification
The visualisations below shows the composition of people aged 16+ by level of qualification. Data is taken from the 2021 Census.

There are 450 people in Calverton ward with an apprenticeship as their highest qualification, 7.22% of all people aged over 16. This is higher than the average for Nottinghamshire (6.13%) and higher than the average for England (5.32%).
 
Level of Qualification

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
No Qualifications
1,277
20.49%
131,460
19.36%
8,317,789
18.08%

Level 1
695
11.15%
69,090
10.17%
4,456,198
9.69%

Level 2
866
13.90%
95,197
14.02%
6,126,130
13.32%

Level 3
1,167
18.73%
120,687
17.77%
7,784,977
16.92%

Apprenticeship
450
7.22%
41,598
6.13%
2,446,935
5.32%

Level 4/5
1,618
25.97%
203,107
29.91%
15,606,458
33.92%

Other
158
2.54%
17,929
2.64%
1,268,468
2.76%

Source: Census 2021

 
Level of Qualification


Source: Census 2021

 
No Qualifications Over Time
The bar chart below is a visualisation of the change in the proportion of people with no qualifications over a 10 year period by comparing data from Census 2011 to Census 2021.
 
No Qualifications (2011 vs. 2021)


Source: UK Census

 
Students and Higher Education
The boxes below show:
The total number and proportion of adults aged 16+ who are economically active/inactive and a full-time student. Economically active students refers to those aged 16+ who are in full-time education and who are either in employment or unemployed yet seeking out work. Economically inactive students refer to those aged 16+ who are in full-time education, are unemployed and have not sought work in the last four weeks and/or are not available to start work in the next two weeks. Figures are taken from the 2021 Census. The percentage of state school pupils going into higher education. The data is recorded as the proportion of the 16 year old state-funded mainstream school pupils in the area who sat their GCSEs in the summers between 2019 to 2020 and that were then in higher education at the age of 18 or 19.
The rate of state school pupils in Calverton ward participating in higher education is 40.69%. This is higher than Nottinghamshire (35.74%) and higher than England (40.32%).
 
Economically Active Students

73

1.17% (Nottinghamshire = 1.66%, England = 2.3%)

Economically Inactive Students

182

2.92% (Nottinghamshire = 4.02%, England = 5.64%)

Participation in Higher Education

40.69%

(Nottinghamshire = 35.74%, England = 40.32%)


Source: Census 2021/Office for Students (OFS)

 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD): Education, Skills and Training Domain
The boxes below show data from the Indices of Deprivation, Education Skills and Training domain. It measures the lack of attainment and skills in the local population and is derived from two sub-domains: one relating to children and young people and one relating to adult skills. Data shows the average LSOA ranks for Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England, where a lower rank indicates higher levels of deprivation.

The average LSOA rank in Calverton ward is 13,802. This is lower than Nottinghamshire (15,642) and lower than England (16,446). Therefore, Calverton ward has higher levels of deprivation on this domain compared to Nottinghamshire and higher levels of deprivation on this domain compared to England.
 
Education, Skills and Training Rank

13,802

(Nottinghamshire = 15,642, England = 16,446)

Children and Young People (Sub-domain) Rank

13,544

(Nottinghamshire = 15,994, England = 16,433)

Adult Skills (Sub-domain) Rank

13,663

(Nottinghamshire = 15,130, England = 16,474)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
For further insight, the bar chart below shows the proportion of people living in neighbourhoods grouped into deciles according to level of deprivation derived from the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) education domain. To clarify, all neighbourhoods in England are grouped into ten equal sized groups “deciles”; neighbourhoods in decile 1 fall within the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally and LSOAs in decile 10 fall within the least deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally.

0% of people in Calverton ward fall within the the first decile on the Education, Skills and Training domain.
 
IoD 2019 Education Domain Deciles


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 

Energy (Fuel Poverty and Consumption) The following selection of data visualisations provides insight into fuel poverty, prevalence of prepay electric meters, energy consumption, and the carbon footprint of an area. This collection of data on interconnected issues aims to empower informed decision-making towards a more equitable and sustainable future.
 
Households in Fuel Poverty
The chart below shows estimates for the number of households in fuel poverty between 2011 and 2022. A household is considered fuel poor if a) it is living in a property with an energy efficiency rating of band D, E, F or G; and b) its disposable income (income after housing costs and energy needs) would be below the poverty line.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of households in fuel poverty has decreased, from 12.3% in 2011 to 11.24% in 2022. This latest figure for Calverton ward is lower than in Nottinghamshire (14.35%) and lower than in England (13.05%).

 
Households in Fuel Poverty


Source: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

 
Energy Consumption
The boxes below show:
The average annual gas and electricity energy consumption per household (MWh) in 2023. For the purpose of these metrics a household is defined by having its own gas or electricity meter. The total carbon footprint per person in units of kilogrammes of carbon dioxide equivalent. This is based on seven underlying sources of emissions data: Electricity, Gas, Other Heating, Car Driving, Van Driving, Flights, and Consumption of goods and services. This data is sourced from the 2021 Place-based Carbon Calculator produced with funding from UK Research and Innovation through the Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions. Note: Raw data is published at small area level, therefore the data at local authority or higher levels has been aggregated from smaller geographies.
In Calverton ward, the total carbon footprint per person is 8,848kg of carbon dioxide equivalent, which is higher than the carbon footprint in Nottinghamshire (8,264kg) and higher than the carbon footprint in England (8,133kg).
 
Electricity Consumption per Household (MWh)

3,189.7MWh

(Nottinghamshire = 3,217.8MWh, England = 3,339.6MWh)

Gas Consumption per Household (MWh)

11,691.7MWh

(Nottinghamshire = 11,886.0MWh, England = 11,578.8MWh)

Carbon Footprint per Person (Kg)

8,848kg

(Nottinghamshire = 8,264kg, England = 8,133kg)


Source: Department for Energy Security & Net Zero (2023)/Place-based Carbon Calculator (PBCC; 2021)

 
Prevalence of Prepay Electric Meters
The bar chart below shows the number of prepay electric meters per 1,000 households in 2017.

In Calverton ward, there are 84.84 prepay meters for every 1,000 households. This rate is similar to in Nottinghamshire (87.36) and lower than in England (110.07).
 
Prepay Electric Meters


Source: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy

 

Health (Children) The following data is a selection of indicators relating to children's health. Understanding and monitoring children's health is crucial for policymakers and healthcare professionals. These children's health indicators provide valuable insights into well-being, areas of concern, and helps formulate evidence-based interventions and policies. By examining indicators such as birth outcomes, poverty rates, mortality rates, and healthcare utilisation, we gain a holistic understanding of the factors influencing children's health. This data aids in identifying vulnerable populations, tracking progress, addressing disparities, and ultimately improving the overall health outcomes and quality of life for children.
 
Income Deprivation Affecting Children
The boxes below show:
The 2015-2016 Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI). This specific measure comprises children aged 0-15 living in income deprived families, defined as families that either receive Income Support, Jobseekers Allowance, income-based Employment and Support Allowance, Pension Credit (Guarantee), Universal Credit (in the 'Searching for work', 'No work requirements', 'Planning for work', 'Working with requirements' and 'Preparing for work' conditionality groups) or families not in receipt of these benefits but in receipt of Working Tax Credit or Child Tax Credit with an equivalised income (excluding housing benefit) below 60 per cent of the national median before housing costs. Note: Child asylum seekers are not included. Children aged 0-19 in absolute low-income families in 2024 (defined as a family with an income below 60% of median income), broken down by family type. Here income is measured before housing costs are deducted and a family must have claimed one or more of; Universal Credit, Tax Credits or Housing Benefit at any point in the year to be classed as low income in these statistics. Children living in relative low-income families in 2024. This differs from absolute low-income families in that here income is measured before housing costs are deducted. A family must have claimed one or more of; Universal Credit, Tax Credits or Housing Benefit at any point in the year to be classed as low income in these statistics. Children are dependent individuals aged under 16; or aged 16 to 19 in full-time non-advanced education.
Note: A family is defined as in-work if they have an accumulated a period of at least 26 weeks paid employment or self-employment within the 52-week tax year. Family type accounts for changes in family composition throughout the year (for example, re-partnering, multiple partners). A lone parent family type means the parent/guardian has had no partnerships at any point in the year. Statistical disclosure control has been applied to these count figures to avoid the release of confidential data. Breakdowns may therefore not sum to the total amount of children in relative low-income families due to the disclosure control applied.

13.63% of children in Calverton ward are income deprived. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (15.52%) and lower than the proportion in England (17.08%).

 
Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI)

13.63%

(Nottinghamshire = 15.52%, England = 17.08%)

Children Aged 0-19 in Absolute Low-Income Families

329

19.78% (Nottinghamshire = 19.13%, England = 19.18%)

Children Aged 0-19 in Relative Low-Income Families

389

23.38% (Nottinghamshire = 22.43%, England = 22.17%)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)/Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Children in Absolute Low-Income Out of Work Families

99

30.13% (Nottinghamshire = 33.36%, England = 31.87%)

Children in Absolute Low-Income In-Work Families

225

68.44% (Nottinghamshire = 66.64%, England = 68.13%)

Children in Absolute Low-Income Lone Parent Families

175

53.31% (Nottinghamshire = 56.89%, England = 50.87%)

Children in Absolute Low-Income Couple Families

157

47.68% (Nottinghamshire = 43.1%, England = 49.13%)


 
Children in Relative Low-Income Out of Work Families

119

30.63% (Nottinghamshire = 32.22%, England = 31.17%)

Children in Relative Low-Income In-Work Families

263

67.68% (Nottinghamshire = 67.78%, England = 68.83%)

Children in Relative Low-Income Lone Parent Families

224

57.73% (Nottinghamshire = 57.67%, England = 51.91%)

Children in Relative Low-Income Couple Families

167

43.01% (Nottinghamshire = 42.33%, England = 48.09%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Children in Relative Low-Income Families


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Children Providing Unpaid Care
The bar chart below shows the proportion of children (aged 5-15) that are providing informal unpaid care. The figures are based on self reported responses to the 2021 Census. A person is a provider of unpaid care if they give any help or support to family members, friends, neighbours or others because of long-term physical or mental health disability, or problems related to old age.

The proportion of children providing unpaid care in Calverton ward is 1.27%. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (1.08%) and higher than the proportion in England (1.06%).
 
Children Providing Unpaid Care


Source: Census 2021

 
Infant and Child Mortality
The boxes below show the mortality rate for all causes of death for those aged Under 28 days (neonatal), Under 1 (infant), Aged 0-4 (child) or Aged 0-14 between 2019 to 2023. The mortality rate is calculated from the sum total of deaths over the 5 year period, divided by the average population of that age group over those years and multiplied by 100 to provide a percentage.

Note: Data is suppressed when the number of deaths is less than 5, which is often the case when looking at MSOA-level data and below.

The neonatal mortality rate in Calverton ward between 2019 to 2023 was 0%. This is lower than the rate in Nottinghamshire (1.78%) and lower than the rate in England (1.43%).
 
Deaths Under 28 Days (Neonatal Mortality)

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 1.78%, England = 1.43%)

Deaths Under 1 Year (Infant Mortality)

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 2.18%, England = 1.95%)

Deaths Under 5 Years (Child Mortality)

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 0.41%, England = 0.42%)

Deaths Under 15 Years

0

0% (Nottinghamshire = 0.13%, England = 0.16%)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Emergency Hospital Admissions
The bar chart below provides insight into the rate of children and young people admitted to hospital between 2016 to 2021. It gives the crude rate of emergency hospital admissions for children (aged under 5 years) per 1,000 resident population.

There were 134.55 emergency hospital admissions for every 1,000 children in Calverton ward between 2016 to 2021. This is similar to the rate in Nottinghamshire (135.79) and lower than the rate in England (140.66).
 
Emergency Hospital Admissions


Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) NHS Digital

 
Obesity in Children
The boxes below show the proportion of children in either Reception year (aged 4-5) or Year 6 (aged 10-11) classified as obese (including severe obesity) between 2021 to 2024. For population monitoring purposes, a child’s body mass index (BMI) is classed as obese where it is on or above the 95th centile based on the British 1990 (UK90) growth reference data. The population monitoring cut offs for overweight and obesity are lower than the clinical cut offs. This is to capture children in the population in the clinical obesity BMI categories and those who are at high risk of moving into the clinical obesity category.

7.55% of children aged 4-5 were categorised as obese or severely obese in Calverton ward between 2021 to 2024. This is lower than the rate in Nottinghamshire (9.51%) and lower than the rate in England (9.64%).

 
Obesity: Reception

7.55%

(Nottinghamshire = 9.51%, England = 9.64%)

Obesity: Year 6

20%

(Nottinghamshire = 22.39%, England = 22.73%)


Source: National Child Measurement Programme, NHS Digital

 

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness) The following data visualisations provide insights into the prevalence and distribution of disability and long-term illness. This data can help us understand and measure the impact of government policies and programs on those affected and provide an indication of the level of need and support required for people with disabilities in a local area.
 
Disability Benefits

The table below shows a series of indicators related to disability benefits providing the total numbers of claims and proportions within each area that are accessing the support systems available. It includes the following benefits;
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) can help with extra living costs if you have both: a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of your condition. Disability Living Allowance (DLA) is payable to children and adults who become disabled before the age of 65. It is being replaced by other benefits (mainly PIP). Attendance Allowance helps with extra costs if you are over 65 and have a disability severe enough that you need someone to help look after you. Universal Credit (UC) disabled child entitlement is an increased award for the child element of UC where a child is entitled to a rate of DLA or PIP. Universal Credit (UC) limited capability to work entitlement is for when a household member has limited capacity to work due to poor mental or physical health conditions.
12.1% of the working-age population in Calverton ward are receiving Personal Independence Payments (PIP). This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (10.98%) and higher than the proportion in England (9.41%).
 
Disability Benefits

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
521
12.10%
55,835
10.98%
3,380,172
9.41%

Disability Benefit (DLA)
222
2.93%
19,045
2.28%
1,201,270
2.10%

Attendance Allowance
284
15.05%
25,091
14.03%
1,406,281
13.23%

Households on Universal Credit (Disabled Child Entitlement)
74
2.22%
6,200
1.74%
425,722
1.82%

Households on Universal Credit (Limited Capability for Work Entitlement)
160
4.82%
20,239
5.67%
1,438,349
6.14%

Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
The line chart below shows a time series of the proportion of the people (aged 16-64) currently receiving Personal Independence Payment (PIP). PIP helps with some of the extra costs caused by long-term disability, ill-health or terminal ill-health. From 8th April 2013 DWP started to replace Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for working age people with PIP so there has been a consistent increase in PIP since then as the process of replacing DLA continues.

In Jan-2025, 12.1% of those aged 16-64 in Calverton ward were receiving PIP. This rate has increased since Apr-2022 (8.24%). The latest rate is higher than that in Nottinghamshire (10.98%) and higher than the proportion in England (9.41%).
 
Personal Independence Payments (PIP)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
The boxes below give further insight into Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants. The breakdowns include numbers and proportions of male and female recipients as well as for those claiming for mental health or respiratory disease.

3.59% of residents in Calverton ward are receiving PIP due to mental health conditions. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (3.88%) and similar to the proportion in England (3.62%).
 
PIP Claimants: Male

207

9.91% (Nottinghamshire = 10.04%, England = 8.58%)

PIP Claimants: Female

299

13.46% (Nottinghamshire = 11.9%, England = 10.22%)

PIP Claimants: Mental Health

154

3.59% (Nottinghamshire = 3.88%, England = 3.62%)

PIP Claimants: Respiratory Disease

22

0.51% (Nottinghamshire = 0.4%, England = 0.35%)


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
Long-Term Physical/Mental Health Conditions: People and Households
The boxes below show:
The number and proportion of people disabled under the Equality Act with different limitations on day-to-day activity and also for those who have a long term physical or mental health condition but are not limited day to day. The number and proportion of households with at least one person who is disabled under the Equality Act.
Figures are taken from responses to the 2021 Census and are based on a self assessment of whether or not a person has a limiting long-term illness, health problem or disability which limits their daily activities or the work they can do, including problems that are due to old age.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of people disabled under the Equality Act with their day-to-day activities limited a lot is 8.18%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (8.52%) and higher than the proportion in England (7.33%).
 
Day-to-Day Activities Limited a Lot

620

8.18% (Nottinghamshire = 8.52%, England = 7.33%)

Day-to-Day Activities Limited a Little

843

11.13% (Nottinghamshire = 11.21%, England = 9.97%)

Physical or Mental Health Condition but Day-to-Day Activities Are Not Limited

584

7.71% (Nottinghamshire = 7.29%, England = 6.83%)


 
Disabled Under the Equality Act in Household: 1 Person

882

26.5% (Nottinghamshire = 27.05%, England = 25.39%)

Disabled Under the Equality Act in Household: 2+ People

255

7.66% (Nottinghamshire = 7.63%, England = 6.65%)


Source: Census 2021

 
Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI)
The box below shows the Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI) score in 2022.

The Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI) is a composite annual measure of population mental health for each Lower-layer Super Output Area (LSOA) in England. The SAMHI combines data on mental health from multiple sources (NHS-Mental health related hospital attendances, Prescribing data - Antidepressants, QOF - depression, and DWP - claimants of Incapacity Benefit and Employment Support Allowance for mental illness (prior to 2019) or claimants of Disability Living Allowance and Personal Independence Payment for mental illness (in iterations post-2019 when IBESA got discontinued) into a single index. Each indicator was standardised and re-scaled before Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis was used to combine indicators into a single score, where a higher score represents higher levels of need.

The SAMHI score in Calverton ward is 0.62, which has increased since 2011 (-0.39). The latest score in Calverton ward is lower than the latest score in Nottinghamshire (0.92) and lower than the latest score in England (0.67).

 
Small Area Mental Health Index (SAMHI) Score

0.62

(Nottinghamshire = 0.92, England =  0.67)


Source: Place-Based Longitudinal Data Resource (PLDR) (2022)

 

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care) The following visualisations offer insight into various health related data for Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England. It includes prevalence of specific chronic conditions, emergency hospital admissions, self-harm or alcohol related hospital admissions, self-reported health quality, and estimated population activity levels. This selection of data together provides a comprehensive overview of an area's health landscape, shedding light on critical indicators with significant impact on individual and public well-being.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Health Deprivation and Disability Domain
The bar chart below shows the proportion of people living in neighbourhoods, grouped into deciles, according to the level of deprivation derived from The Indices of Deprivation (IoD) 2019 Health Deprivation and Disability domain.

The IoD Health Deprivation and Disability domain measures the risk of premature death and the impairment of quality of life through poor physical or mental health. The domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality but not aspects of behaviour or environment that may be predictive of future health deprivation. The following indicators are included: Years of potential life lost: An age and sex standardised measure of premature death; Comparative illness and disability ratio: An age and sex standardised morbidity/disability ratio; Acute morbidity: An age and sex standardised rate of emergency admission to hospital; Mood and anxiety disorders: A composite based on the rate of adults suffering from mood and anxiety disorders hospital episodes data, and suicide mortality data.

A higher score in this IoD domain indicates that an area is experiencing greater levels of deprivation relating to health and disability measures. To clarify, all neighbourhoods in England are grouped into ten equal sized groups “deciles”; neighbourhoods in decile 1 fall within the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally and neighbourhoods in decile 10 fall within the least deprived 10% of neighbourhoods nationally.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Health Deprivation and Disability Domain


Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Self-Reported General Health
The table below shows data from Census 2021 on the total number and proportion of residents within each response category from a self-assessment of general health.

1.24% of people in Calverton ward have very bad health. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (1.3%) and similar to the proportion in England (1.17%).
 
Self-Reported General Health

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Very Good
3,380
44.60%
375,854
45.57%
27,390,829
48.49%

Good
2,653
35.00%
283,286
34.35%
19,040,735
33.71%

Fair
1,113
14.69%
117,637
14.26%
7,147,346
12.65%

Bad
339
4.47%
37,298
4.52%
2,248,255
3.98%

Very Bad
94
1.24%
10,747
1.30%
662,881
1.17%

Source: Census 2021

 
In Calverton ward the proportion of people suffering with very bad health has remained stable since 2011, from 1.39% to 1.24%.
 
Very Bad Health Over Time


Source: UK Census

 
Condition Prevalence
The table below shows the estimated percentage of various condition prevalence. These estimates are calculated based on the number of people listed on GP registers in 2022/23, and the number of people recorded as having the relevant health conditions. The data from England's GP practices was published by NHS digital at small area level, therefore the data showing at local authority or a higher level has been aggregated from smaller geographies.

High blood pressure, obesity and depression are often the most prevalent three conditions in population samples from the categories.

11.14% of people in Calverton ward are recorded as having depression. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (12.62%) and lower than the proportion in England (13.41%).

17.09% of people in Calverton ward are recorded as having high blood pressure. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (15.43%) and higher than the proportion in England (14.63%).

13.82% of people are recorded as obese in Calverton ward. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (12.93%) and higher than the proportion in England (11.55%).

Note: These are only estimates and they are sensitive to the accuracy of GP data reporting. Some differences between areas may reflect differences in the way that GP practices operate, measure and record, rather than genuine differences in prevalence.
 
Condition Prevalence

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England
Asthma
7.29%
6.92%
6.60%

Cancer
4.69%
3.89%
3.56%

Coronary Heart Disease
3.86%
3.41%
3.04%

Chronic Kidney Disease
4.48%
5.17%
4.27%

COPD
2.15%
2.17%
1.88%

Dementia
0.85%
0.94%
0.76%

Depression
11.14%
12.62%
13.41%

Diabetes
7.34%
7.76%
7.54%

Epilepsy
0.82%
0.94%
0.82%

Heart Failure
1.16%
1.17%
1.01%

High Blood Pressure
17.09%
15.43%
14.63%

Learning Disabilities
0.33%
0.60%
0.56%

Obesity
13.82%
12.93%
11.55%

Osteoporosis
0.24%
0.89%
0.94%

Peripheral Arterial Disease
0.74%
0.60%
0.58%

Pre-Diabetes
5.48%
6.43%
7.18%

Rheumatoid Arthritis
0.82%
0.76%
0.78%

Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack
2.85%
2.14%
1.88%

Source: House of Commons Library

 
Emergency Hospital Admissions
The bar chart below shows emergency admissions to hospital for various conditions. The NHS Data Model and Dictionary defines emergency admissions as those which are 'unpredictable and at short notice because of clinical need'. This indicator allows the level of such admissions at a local level to be compared to those expected given the age structure of local populations. High levels of emergency admissions may be due to a variety of causes such as high levels of injury within a population or poor management of chronic conditions within primary care. It should be viewed as an indication of the levels of unplanned secondary care use within a population and care should be taken when interpreting these results. To clarify, figures of over 100% indicate actual admissions were above the expected.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of emergency admissions for strokes was 89.82% of the predicted. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (96.92%) and lower than the proportion in England (100.00%).
 
Emergency Hospital Admissions


Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID)

 
Alcohol and Self-Harm Related Hospital Admissions
The boxes below show:
The standardised emergency admission ratio (SAR) for hospital admissions for alcohol attributable conditions (broad definition) between 2016 to 2021. This is defined as whenever the primary diagnosis or any of the secondary diagnoses contain an alcohol-attributable condition. Children under 16 were only included if they had an alcohol-specific diagnosis i.e. where the alcohol-attributable fraction (AAF) equalled one, meaning that alcohol consumption was a contributory factor in all cases. For other conditions, the AAF estimates were not available for children. A SAR is a measure of how more or less likely a person living in that area is to have an emergency admission to hospital compared to the standard population, in this case England, where more than 100% would show more likely and vice versa. The standardised emergency admission ratio (SAR) for hospital admissions or intentional self harm (ICD10 code X60 to X84) between 2016 to 2021. Again, a SAR measures how more or less likely a person living in that area is to have an emergency admission to hospital compared to the standard population, in this case England, where more than 100% would show more likely and vice versa.
In Calverton ward the proportion of emergency admissions for alcohol attributable conditions was 85.14% of the predicted. This is lower than in Nottinghamshire (96.74%) and lower than in England (100.00%).
 
Emergency Admission Ratio: Alcohol-Attributable Harm

85.14%

(Nottinghamshire = 96.74%, England = 100.00%)

Emergency Admission Ratio: Intentional Self-Harm

112.12%

(Nottinghamshire = 103.50%, England = 100.00%)


Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID)

 
Provision of Unpaid Care
The table below shows the proportion of people providing unpaid care for different amounts of time each week. Figures are based on the self reported responses to the 2021 Census. A person is a provider of unpaid care if they give any help or support to family members, friends, neighbours or others because of long-term physical or mental health or disability, or problems related to old age. The figures include all people of all ages providing unpaid care.

 
Provision of Unpaid Care

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
0 Hours
6,360
88.64%
700,757
89.50%
48,734,833
91.24%

< 9 Hours
309
4.31%
30,296
3.87%
1,668,989
3.12%

10-19 Hours
112
1.56%
11,357
1.45%
634,736
1.19%

20-34 Hours
83
1.16%
7,492
0.96%
452,264
0.85%

35-49 Hours
89
1.24%
8,531
1.09%
517,505
0.97%

> 50 Hours
222
3.09%
24,499
3.13%
1,404,771
2.63%

Source: Census 2021

 
The bar chart below shows the proportion of people providing unpaid care for 50 or more hours per week between the 2011 and 2021 Censuses. A person is a provider of unpaid care if they give any help or support to family members, friends, neighbours or others because of long-term physical or mental health or disability, or problems related to old age. The figures include all people of all ages providing unpaid care.

 
50+ Hours of Unpaid Care


Source: Census 2011/2021

 
Physical Activity
The boxes below show the modelled estimated percentage of adults (aged 16+) who are classed as either physically active or inactive.

In Calverton ward, 66.2 of all adults are classed as physically active. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (63.8) and higher than the proportion in England (64.5).

People are described as being inactive if they have done fewer than 30 minutes of moderate intensity equivalent (MIE) physical activity (excluding gardening) in the past week. Activity is counted in MIE minutes whereby each 'moderate' minute counts as one minute and each 'vigorous' minute counts as two moderate minutes. Moderate activity is defined as activity where you raise your breathing rate, whereas vigorous activity is defined as doing activity where you are out of breath or are sweating (you may not be able to say more than a few words without pausing for breath).
 
Physically Active Adults

66.2

(Nottinghamshire = 63.8, England = 64.5)

Physically Inactive Adults

22.0

(Nottinghamshire = 24.0, England = 23.5)


Source: Sport England (2018-2019)

 

Health (Mortality) The following data visualisations provide a variety of mortality indicators including; life expectancy, causes of death, and years of potential life lost as a result of deprivation. Mortality data is a valuable resource for decision making in public policy, resource allocation and addressing health inequalities to improve population health and well-being.
 
Life Expectancy
The bar chart below shows male and female life expectancy at birth in 2016 to 2021. Life expectancy at birth is a useful summary measure of all cause mortality as it quantifies the differences between areas in units (years of life) that are more readily understood and meaningful to the audience than those of other measures. All cause mortality is a fundamental and probably the oldest measure of the health status of a population. It represents the cumulative effect of the prevalence of risk factors, the prevalence and severity of disease, and the effectiveness of interventions and treatment. Differences in levels of all cause mortality reflect health inequalities between different population groups, e.g. between genders, social classes, and ethnic groups.

In Calverton ward the male life expectancy from birth is 79.38 years old. This is similar to the life expectancy in Nottinghamshire (79.55 years old) and similar to the life expectancy in England (79.49 years old).

The female life expectancy from birth in Calverton ward is 83.06 years old. This is similar to the life expectancy in Nottinghamshire (82.63 years old) and similar to the life expectancy in England (83.17 years old).

Note: Some areas may be missing data due to data suppression for data quality purposes.
 
Life Expectancy at Birth


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Years of Potential Life Lost

The bar chart below shows the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Years of potential life lost (YPLL) score covering the years 2013 to 2017. The score is a measure that helps us understand the impact of deprivation on people's health and well-being. It focuses specifically on the number of years of life that are lost prematurely due to various factors related to deprivation. It calculates the number of years that individuals die before they would be expected to, based on average life expectancy. For example, if someone dies at the age of 60, but the average life expectancy in their area is 75, they would contribute 15 years to the YPLL score. By examining this score, we can identify areas where deprivation has a significant impact on people's health and longevity.

In Calverton ward the YPLL score is 47.43 years. This is lower than the score for Nottinghamshire (54.47) and lower than the score for England (57.06).
 
IoD Years of Potential Life Lost


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Mortality From Key Causes
The bar chart below shows age standardised estimates of deaths from various key causes in 2016 to 2020. The data is presented as a standardised mortality ratio calculated by dividing the observed total deaths in the area (by five year age and gender band) by the expected deaths (applying age-specific death rates for England) and multiplying by 100.

In Calverton ward the actual number of deaths from cancer was 127.01% of the predicted number. This is higher than the percentage in Nottinghamshire (104.35%) and higher than the percentage in England (100.00%).
 
Mortality From Key Causes


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Mortality: Aged Under 75
The boxes below show:
Age standardised estimates of deaths for people aged under 75. The data is presented as a standardised mortality ratio calculated by dividing the observed total deaths in the area by the expected deaths and multiplying by 100. Data is presented for all causes, circulatory disease and all cancers. The crude rate of mortality of those aged under 65 for all causes of death recorded in the ICD-10 codes (A00-R99 - U00-Y89).
In Calverton ward the rate of deaths for those aged under 65 was 0.7%. This is lower than the rate in Nottinghamshire (0.96%) and lower than the rate in England (0.91%).

 
Deaths Under 75: All Causes (Ratio)

90.56

(Nottinghamshire = 99.37, England = 100.00)

Deaths Under 75: Circulatory Disease (Ratio)

99.46

(Nottinghamshire = 97.88, England = 100.00)

Deaths Under 75: All Cancers (Ratio)

97.57

(Nottinghamshire = 101.49, England = 100.00)

Deaths Under 65: All Causes

40

0.7% (Nottinghamshire = 0.96%, England = 0.91%)


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 

Housing (Affordability) The following data visualisations show key metrics related to housing costs and affordability. It includes average house prices, the evolution of property prices over time, a ratio of property churn, the Indices of Deprivation owner affordability and renter affordability scores, and finally, proportions of dwellings within each of the different council tax bands. These indicators offer an insight into housing costs and affordability to enable policymakers, stakeholders, and individuals to better understand the challenges and opportunities within the housing market of an area.
 
Average House Prices

The boxes below show the mean house prices by accommodation type across Calverton ward and comparator areas for four key dwelling types (detached houses, semi-detached houses, terraced houses and flats). Data on house prices is from the Land Registry open data, price-paid dataset  The Land Registry collect data on all housing transactions, published by individual property and date with the average house-price for all property types calculated on a rolling 12 months total.

The average property price for all dwelling types in Calverton ward was £258,358 between Mar-2024 to Feb-2025. This is higher than within Nottinghamshire (£252,542) and lower than the average within England (£356,508).

Note: Some small areas may not have had a transaction recorded within the twelve month period leading to gaps in the boxes below.
 
Average House Price

£258,358

(Nottinghamshire = £252,542, England = £356,508)


 
Average House Price: Detached

£326,717

(Nottinghamshire = £356,098, England = £512,675)

Average House Price: Semi-Detached

£209,177

(Nottinghamshire = £215,288, England = £321,109)

Average House Price: Terraced

£218,272

(Nottinghamshire = £165,710, England = £297,302)

Average House Price: Flats

£132,263

(Nottinghamshire = £145,940, England = £312,867)


Source: Land Registry

 
Average House Prices Over Time

The line chart below shows a time series of property price changes over time for the four key dwelling types.

In the 12 months from Mar-2024 to Feb-2025, the most recent figures for Calverton ward, the average property price was £258,358. This is an increase from the average amount in the 12 months from Jun-2018 to May-2019 (£197,305).

Note: Some small areas may not have had a transaction recorded within the twelve month period leading to gaps in the chart below.
 
Average House Prices Over Time


Source: Land Registry

 
Property Transaction Ratio

The line chart below shows a time series of the property transaction ratio over time, for the four key dwelling types, as a proportion to the number of private dwellings. Private housing dwelling stock are properties that are privately rented or owner occupied and is used as an estimate of the pool of housing potentially available for sale. A high value indicates areas that have seen high numbers of property transactions compared to the number of available properties.

In the 12 months from Mar-2024 to Feb-2025, the most recent figures for Calverton ward, the number of property transactions was 107, a ratio of 0.04. This has increased in comparison to the 12 months from Mar-2020 to Feb-2021 (87 transactions, a ratio of 0.029).
 
Property Transaction Ratio


Source: Land Registry

 
IoD Housing Affordability

The boxes below show two indicators from the Indices of Deprivation (IoD) where a higher score indicates greater deprivation. This includes the 2016 owner-occupation affordability indicator which measures the inability of the local population to afford to enter owner-occupation. It also includes the 2016 private rental affordability indicator which measures the inability to afford to enter the private rental market. The private rental component considers whether people can afford to rent in the market without assistance from housing benefit.

In Calverton ward the score for private rental affordability from 2016 was 0.406. This is higher than the score in Nottinghamshire (0.387) and lower than the score in England (0.487).

If we also look at owner-occupation affordability in Calverton ward, the score from 2016 was 0.431. This is higher than the score in Nottinghamshire (0.394) and lower than the score in England (0.620).
 
IoD 2019 Owner-Occupation Affordability

0.431

(Nottinghamshire = 0.394, England = 0.620)

IoD 2019 Private Rental Affordability

0.406

(Nottinghamshire = 0.387, England = 0.487)


Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Council Tax Bands

The table below shows the overall proportion of domestic properties (the 'dwelling stock') allocated to the standard Council Tax bands. Council tax valuations in England are based on the price a property would have fetched if it had been sold on the open market on 1 April 1991. There are nine Council tax bands in total ranging from band A to H, with band A representing the lowest property value and Band H representing the highest property value.

In Calverton ward the proportion of dwelling stock within council tax Band A as of 2024-2025 was 29.34%. This is less than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (38.48%) and higher the proportion in England (23.81%).

At the other end of the scale, in Calverton ward the proportion of dwelling stock within council tax Band H as of 2024-2025 was 0.04%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.13%) and less than the proportion in England (0.6%).
 
Dwellings by Council Tax Band

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England
Band A
29.34%
38.48%
23.81%

Band B
24.55%
20.70%
19.49%

Band C
22.08%
17.19%
21.93%

Band D
13.98%
11.81%
15.65%

Band E
7.34%
6.75%
9.78%

Band F
2.01%
3.21%
5.20%

Band G
0.98%
1.74%
3.54%

Band H
0.04%
0.13%
0.60%

Source: Valuation Office Agency (VOA)

 

Housing (Characteristics) The following data visualisations show key metrics related to housing characteristics. It includes dwelling types, tenure, number of rooms, and property age. These indicators offer an insight into the types of dwelling people are living in to support policymakers, stakeholders, and individuals to better understand the challenges and opportunities related to the housing stock of an area.
 
Dwelling Types
The table below shows the type of dwelling space people live in. A dwelling space is defined as the accommodation occupied by an individual household or, if unoccupied, available for an individual household, for example the whole of a terraced house, or a flat in a purpose-built block of flats. Figures are taken from the 2021 Census.

In Calverton ward 0.36% of homes are flats in converted houses. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.97%) and lower than the proportion in England (3.5%).
 
Dwelling Types

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Detached
1,313
39.49%
130,527
36.55%
5,368,859
22.91%

Semi-Detached
1,370
41.20%
135,375
37.91%
7,378,304
31.48%

Terraced
204
6.14%
56,215
15.74%
5,381,432
22.96%

Purpose Built Flats
282
8.48%
26,476
7.41%
3,999,771
17.07%

Flats: In Converted House
12
0.36%
3,453
0.97%
821,153
3.50%

Flats: In Commercial Building
12
0.36%
2,092
0.59%
197,967
0.84%

Caravan/Temporary Accommodation
123
3.70%
1,492
0.42%
99,894
0.43%

Source: Census 2021

 
Dwelling Types


Source: Census 2021

 
Housing Tenure
The table below provides both the proportion of the area's population and the overall count for different housing tenures. The tenure of a household is derived from the response to the 2021 Census question asking whether the household owns or rents its accommodation and, if rented, from the response to the question asking who is the landlord.

 
Housing Tenure

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Owned Outright
1,434
43.10%
136,577
38.24%
7,624,693
32.53%

Owned: With Mortgage/Loan
1,037
31.17%
113,116
31.67%
6,744,372
28.78%

Shared Ownership
18
0.54%
2,034
0.57%
235,951
1.01%

Rented: From Council
109
3.28%
30,129
8.44%
1,945,152
8.30%

Rented: From Housing Association
226
6.79%
15,581
4.36%
2,060,511
8.79%

Private Rented: Landlord/Letting Agency
417
12.53%
52,097
14.59%
4,273,689
18.24%

Private Rented: Other
89
2.68%
7,097
1.99%
521,200
2.22%

Living Rent Free
2
0.06%
493
0.14%
30,517
0.13%

Source: Census 2021

 
Housing Tenure


Source: Census 2021

 
Dwellings by Room Number
The bar chart below shows dwellings by number of rooms. This count excludes bathrooms, toilets, halls/landings, or rooms that can only be used for storage. Figures are self reported from the 2021 Census.

The proportion of one room dwellings in Calverton ward is 0.06%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.24%) and lower than the proportion in England (1.09%).

For comparison, the proportion of dwellings with nine or more rooms in Calverton ward is 0.48%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.74%) and similar to the proportion in England (1.13%).
 
Dwellings by Room Number


Source: Census 2021

 
Age of Housing Stock
The table below shows data from the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) about the age of the housing stock in the area. It displays the number and proportion of dwellings in the local area that were built prior to 1900 and each subsequent decade. A dwelling in this case refers to the accommodation itself, for example a house or a flat and includes second homes that are not let out commercially. Counts are rounded to the nearest 10 at source, with counts between 1 and 4 suppressed.

The proportion of dwellings built in Calverton ward between 2020 and 2024 was 6.55%. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (4.08%) and higher than the proportion in England (3.5%).

For comparison, the proportion of dwellings in Calverton ward built prior to 1900 was 4.44%. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (9.03%) and lower than the proportion in England (15.06%).
 
Age of Housing Stock

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Before 1900
159
4.44%
34,740
9.03%
3,849,740
15.06%

1900 to 1918
20
0.56%
21,940
5.70%
1,300,800
5.09%

1919 to 1929
63
1.75%
23,680
6.15%
1,230,390
4.81%

1930 to 1939
11
0.32%
35,450
9.21%
2,589,160
10.13%

1945 to 1954
266
7.43%
29,170
7.58%
1,641,930
6.42%

1955 to 1964
1,170
32.75%
44,140
11.47%
2,515,800
9.84%

1965 to 1972
320
8.94%
40,520
10.53%
2,406,960
9.42%

1973 to 1982
562
15.72%
38,060
9.89%
2,269,250
8.88%

1983 to 1992
136
3.82%
25,240
6.56%
1,769,910
6.92%

1993 to 1999
151
4.23%
20,490
5.32%
1,281,050
5.01%

2000 to 2009
225
6.31%
27,760
7.21%
1,793,070
7.01%

2010 to 2019
218
6.11%
23,340
6.06%
1,792,420
7.01%

2020 to 2024
234
6.55%
15,700
4.08%
895,220
3.50%

Source: Valuation Office Agency (VOA)

 

Housing (Condition) The following data visualisations offer a selection of indicators that are focused on housing conditions. These indicators specifically highlight aspects such as overcrowding, heating provision, gas network connection, energy efficiency and lack of insulation. Together this data offers valuable insights into the state of housing quality, supporting the identification of areas with challenges related to their housing quality. This information can inform targeted interventions, resource allocation, and policy decisions aimed at improving housing conditions, addressing energy inefficiency, reducing overcrowding, and ensuring adequate heating provision.
 
Indices of Deprivation (IoD) Housing in Poor Condition Score
The box below shows the Indices of Deprivation 2019 housing in poor condition score. This indicator is a modelled estimate of the proportion of social and private homes that fail to meet the Decent Homes standard. A property fails the Decent Homes Standard if it fails to meet any one of four separate components: 1) Housing Health and Safety Rating System 2) Disrepair 3) Modernisation 4) Thermal comfort. Each of these components was modelled separately, using data from the 2015 English Housing Survey at national level, in combination with a commercial dataset that provides information on the age, type, tenure and occupant characteristics of the housing stock at individual dwelling level. A higher score indicates that an area is experiencing high levels of deprivation.

Calverton ward has an IoD housing in poor condition score of 0.147. This is lower than the score in Nottinghamshire (0.188) and lower than the score in England (0.196).
 
IoD Housing in Poor Condition Score

0.147

(Nottinghamshire = 0.188, England = 0.196)


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government

 
Overcrowded Housing
The bar chart below shows the proportion of houses within the two categories of overcrowded. Households are classified as overcrowded if there is at least one room fewer than needed for household requirements using standard definitions. A further definition has households classified as overcrowded if there is at least one bedroom fewer than needed for household requirements.

There are two legal definitions of overcrowding – the room and the space standards. The room standard is based on the number and sex of people who must sleep in one room. The room standard is contravened in a situation where two people aged 10+ of the opposite sex must sleep in the same room (excluding cohabiting or married couples). The space standard is based on the maximum number of people who may sleep in a dwelling of a particular size. The permitted number of people depends on the size of the room, the number of living rooms and bedrooms in the dwelling, and the age of the occupants.

In Calverton ward 1.41% of housing is defined as having too few bedrooms. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (1.82%) and lower than the proportion in England (4.37%).
 
Overcrowded Housing


Source: Census 2021

 
Heating Provision
The table below shows the number and proportion of households living in accommodation in the area according to different heating provision types using 2021 Census data and definitions.

In Calverton ward 79.78% of households have heating from mains gas only. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (80.31%) and higher than the proportion in England (73.96%).
 
Heating Provision

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Mains Gas Only
2,655
79.78%
286,808
80.31%
17,334,040
73.96%

Wood Only
3
0.09%
442
0.12%
31,030
0.13%

Tank or Bottled Gas Only
68
2.04%
2,963
0.83%
232,512
0.99%

Solid Fuel Only
27
0.81%
2,531
0.71%
41,968
0.18%

Renewable Energy Only
6
0.18%
1,454
0.41%
92,396
0.39%

District or Communal Heat Networks Only
16
0.48%
873
0.24%
216,548
0.92%

Other Central Heating Only
8
0.24%
2,139
0.60%
217,543
0.93%

Two or More Types: Including Renewable Energy
14
0.42%
1,793
0.50%
126,692
0.54%

Two or More Types: Not Including Renewable Energy
276
8.29%
29,044
8.13%
1,989,260
8.49%

Source: Census 2021

 
Houses Without Central Heating and Connection to the Gas Network
The boxes below show:
The number and proportion of households in the area which lack central heating. A household is described as 'without central heating' if it had no central heating in any of the rooms (whether used or not). Central heating includes gas, oil or solid fuel central heating, night storage heaters, warm air heating and underfloor heating. Figures are taken from the 2021 Census. The number and proportion of households without mains gas. These estimates are based on the difference between the number of households and the number of domestic gas meters as published in the 2022 Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) sub-national gas consumption data.
In Calverton ward 0.96% of households lack central heating. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.8%) and lower than the proportion in England (1.5%).
 
Households Lacking Central Heating

32

0.96% (Nottinghamshire =0.8%, England = 1.5%)

Households Not Connected to the Gas Network

68

1.97% (Nottinghamshire = 6.23%, England = 14.77%)


Source: Census 2021/Department of Energy Security & Net Zero (2022)

 
Energy Efficiency
The chart below shows the percentage of domestic buildings within different bands of energy efficiency rating as derived from Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) for dwellings between Mar-2013 and Jan-2023. An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) provides information on the energy efficiency of a building. Since 2007, an EPC is required when a building is constructed, sold or let and it is valid for 10 years. EPCs are based on data about a building's energy features (like the building materials used, heating systems and insulation, for example), which are collected by an accredited energy assessor and are entered into government-approved software to generate the EPC.

Note: This data does not reflect all dwellings in England and Wales, because not every dwelling has an EPC. These are only required when a dwelling is constructed, sold or let. There can be multiple EPC lodgements for the same dwelling, but we analyse the latest lodgement only so we do not double count dwellings. The Individual EPC bands are calculated based on the energy efficiency scores at the time the EPC lodgement was assessed. This means that our statistics do not necessarily reflect energy efficiency improvements as the majority of alterations don't require a new EPC to be generated.

In Calverton ward, 48.06% of all EPC lodgements over this period were rated A-C (the highest energy efficiency). This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (42.53%) and higher than the proportion in England (45.69%).
For comparison, 1.52% of EPC lodgements were rated F-G in Calverton ward (the lowest energy efficiency). This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (2.92%) and lower than the proportion in England (2.8%).
 
Energy Efficiency


Source: Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

 
Priority Places for Insulation Index
The chart below shows the overall rank for the Priority Places for Insulation Index (PPII)  as well as the ranks for six of the PPII's underlying domains related to housing condition. The Priority Places for Insulation Index (PPII) ranks geographical areas within each nation of the UK across eight different indicators relating to insulation needs. The index is produced by weighting and combining the eight indicators to construct an overall ranking of Priority Places for Insulation within each nation. A higher rank indicates higher insulation need. The domains shown below include:

Wall, Floor and Roof Insulation - areas are ranked based on the proportion of properties with uninsulated walls (all types), floors and lofts/roofs as a percentage of total properties with EPCs in an area. Property Type - areas are ranked based on the proportion of properties which are flats/maisonettes from total properties with EPCs in the area. Property Age - areas are ranked based on a scoring methodology for property age. Insulation Installation Firm Supply - areas are ranked based on the level of installation firm supply available. The PPII established a list of available installers using data web-scraped from a list of sites which contain directories of insulation installers and general tradespeople. These sites are; TrustMark, Insulation Assurance Authority (IAA), National Insulation Association (NIA), Checkatrade, and TrustATrader. The metric assumes installers will travel a radius of up to 25 miles from where their offices are located.
Calverton ward has lower overall insulation need compared to Nottinghamshire and lower overall insulation need compared to England.
 
Priority Places for Insulation Index


Source: Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC)

 

Population (Demographic Summary) The following data visualisations offer insight into the summary demographics of the population. This includes; composition by age bands (both broad and detailed) and sex, population change over time, population density and household composition.
 
Population Composition
The table below provides insight into the population composition in Calverton ward. These population figures provide detail of the structure of the population by broad age bands and sex. This data is taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) 2022 Mid-Year Population Estimates.

There are 7,589 people in Calverton ward. This is smaller than the population of Nottinghamshire (835,054) and smaller than the population of England (57,112,542).
 
Population Composition

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Total Population
7,589
-
835,054
-
57,112,542
-

Males
3,661
48.24%
409,878
49.08%
27,986,032
49.00%

Females
3,928
51.76%
425,176
50.92%
29,126,510
51.00%

Population Aged 0-15
1,394
18.37%
147,796
17.70%
10,567,635
18.50%

Population Aged 16 to 64
4,307
56.75%
508,407
60.88%
35,915,152
62.88%

Population Aged 65+
1,888
24.88%
178,851
21.42%
10,629,755
18.61%

Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Population by Age and Gender
The population pyramid below shows how the population in Calverton ward is distributed by age and gender. This data is taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) 2022 Mid-Year Population Estimates.
 
Population by Age and Gender


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Population Change
The line chart below shows a time-series of population change since 2001. These population figures are taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Mid-Year Estimates.

In Calverton ward the total population has increased, from 7,147 in 2001 to 7,721 in 2020.

 
Population Change


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Population Density
The bar chart below shows population density as person per square kilometre. These population figures are taken from the 2022 Office for National Statistics (ONS) Mid-Year Estimates.

In Calverton ward, the population density is 392.16 persons per square kilometre. This is lower than the population density in Nottinghamshire (400.55) and lower than the population density in England (437.87).
 
Population Density


Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)

 
Household Composition
The table below shows both the count and percentage of different household compositions. Figures are self-reported and taken from the household composition questions in the 2021 Census.
 
Household Composition

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
One Person Household: Aged 66+
494
14.85%
49,179
13.77%
3,001,789
12.81%

One Person Household: Aged Under 66
476
14.31%
56,495
15.82%
4,050,440
17.28%

One Family: All Aged 66+
426
12.80%
39,712
11.12%
2,145,278
9.15%

Married/Civil Partnership: No Children
414
12.44%
43,503
12.18%
2,440,210
10.41%

Married/Civil Partnership: Dependent Children
415
12.47%
47,700
13.36%
3,375,402
14.40%

Married/Civil Partnership: Non-dependent Children
207
6.22%
20,444
5.72%
1,314,182
5.61%

Cohabiting Couple: No Children
185
5.56%
24,567
6.88%
1,486,961
6.34%

Cohabiting Couple: Dependent Children
195
5.86%
19,129
5.36%
1,053,001
4.49%

Cohabiting Couple: Non-dependent Children
33
0.99%
2,977
0.83%
169,017
0.72%

Lone Parent: Dependent Children
208
6.25%
22,533
6.31%
1,617,076
6.90%

Lone Parent: Non-dependent Children
159
4.78%
13,124
3.67%
977,825
4.17%

Other Household Types: Dependent Children
54
1.62%
6,283
1.76%
630,340
2.69%

Multiple-Family: Dependent Children
54
1.62%
6,283
1.76%
630,340
2.69%

Other Household Types: Other (Incl Full-time Students & Aged 66+)
54
1.62%
9,717
2.72%
990,594
4.23%

Source: Census 2021

 

Population (Ethnicity) The following data is a collection of indicators which provide insight into the ethnicity, religion and birthplace of the population.
 
Ethnic Composition
The chart below shows the proportion of people by broad ethnic group. This is based on self-responses to each person’s perceived ethnic group and cultural background in the 2021 Census.
 
Ethnic Composition


Source: Census 2021

 
White British, White non-British and non-White Ethnic Groups
The boxes below show the number and percentage of people in White British, White non-British and non-White ethnic groups. This is based on self-responses to each person’s perceived ethnic group and cultural background in the 2021 Census.

95.53% of Calverton ward's population are White British. This is higher than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (88.42%) and higher than the proportion in England (73.54%).
 
White British

7,238

95.53% (Nottinghamshire = 88.42%, England = 73.54%)

White non-British

131

1.73% (Nottinghamshire = 4.6%, England = 7.51%)

non-White

208

2.75% (Nottinghamshire = 6.98%, England = 18.95%)


Source: Census 2021

 
Household Ethnicity Composition
The boxes below show the composition of household ethnicity based on responses to the ethnicity questions in the 2021 Census.

In Calverton ward, 66.29% of households share the same ethnic group. This is greater than the proportion in Nottinghamshire with 64.08% and greater than the proportion in England with 59.5%.
 
All Household Members Have the Same Ethnic Group

2,206

66.29% (Nottinghamshire = 64.08%, England = 59.5%)

Different Ethnic Groups Between Generations Only

32

0.96% (Nottinghamshire = 1.04%, England = 1.81%)

Different Ethnic Groups Within Partnerships

99

2.97% (Nottinghamshire = 4.05%, England = 5.9%)

Other Combinations of Multiple Ethnic Groups

21

0.63% (Nottinghamshire = 1.25%, England = 2.7%)


Source: Census 2021

 
Ethnic Minorities
The table below provides further breakdown of ethnicity in the area and shows the number and proportion of people who identify as specific ethnic minority groups.
 
Ethnic Minorities

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
White Irish
29
0.38%
4,019
0.49%
494,251
0.87%

Gypsy/Traveller
2
0.03%
732
0.09%
64,218
0.11%

White Roma
0
0.00%
564
0.07%
99,138
0.18%

Other White
100
1.32%
32,620
3.95%
3,585,003
6.35%

White/Caribbean
79
1.04%
7,203
0.87%
499,310
0.88%

White/African
7
0.09%
1,806
0.22%
241,528
0.43%

White/Asian
22
0.29%
4,601
0.56%
474,190
0.84%

Indian
8
0.11%
10,344
1.25%
1,843,248
3.26%

Pakistani
3
0.04%
5,013
0.61%
1,570,285
2.78%

Bangladeshi
0
0.00%
888
0.11%
629,567
1.11%

Chinese
3
0.04%
3,890
0.47%
431,165
0.76%

African
18
0.24%
5,255
0.64%
1,468,474
2.60%

Caribbean
23
0.30%
3,268
0.40%
619,419
1.10%

Arab
3
0.04%
1,554
0.19%
320,203
0.57%

Source: Census 2021

 
Birthplace
The table below shows the composition of people in the area by birthplace. This is based on self-reported responses to the country of birth question in the 2021 Census.

In Calverton ward, 96.95% were born in the UK. This is greater than the proportion of UK born in Nottinghamshire (91.98%) and greater than the proportion of UK born in England (82.65%).
 
Birthplace

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
UK
7,349
96.95%
758,684
91.98%
46,687,506
82.65%

EU14 Countries
66
0.87%
10,967
1.33%
1,578,673
2.79%

EU8 Countries
31
0.41%
17,320
2.10%
1,190,391
2.11%

EU2 Countries
4
0.05%
5,846
0.71%
677,216
1.20%

Other EU
8
0.11%
855
0.10%
105,486
0.19%

Europe: Non-EU Countries
8
0.11%
2,463
0.30%
491,064
0.87%

Africa
24
0.32%
7,681
0.93%
1,555,856
2.75%

Middle East & Asia
39
0.51%
15,703
1.90%
3,241,701
5.74%

Americas & Caribbean
39
0.51%
3,984
0.48%
773,377
1.37%

Antarctica & Oceania
10
0.13%
1,193
0.14%
168,004
0.30%

British Overseas
2
0.03%
126
0.02%
20,775
0.04%

Source: Census 2021

 
Religious Affiliation
The chart below shows population composition by religious affiliation. This information was created from responses to the religion question in the 2021 Census.

In Calverton ward, 45.1% of the population has no religious belief. This is greater than the proportion with no religious belief in Nottinghamshire (44.8%) and greater than the proportion with no religious belief in England (36.67%).

Note: The rate has been calculated as a proportion of all people who replied to this question (those who have not answered are excluded).
 
Religious Affiliation


Source: Census 2021

 

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation) The following data visualisations offer an insight into how people self-report their sexual orientation and gender identity.
 
Sexual Orientation
The table below classifies residents aged 16 years and over in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England by how they self-reported their sexual orientation in the 2021 Census.

The sexual orientation question in the 2021 Census was voluntary. Whilst the ONS predominantly present these figures as a proportion of the overall population, the table below uses only people who responded to the sexual orientation question as the denominator. These indicators therefore represent the sexual orientation breakdowns as a proportion of all who responded to this question. This provides additional value as the response rate to this question can vary considerably across local areas.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of respondents that identified as Gay or Lesbian was 1.25%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (1.42%) and similar to the proportion in England (1.67%).
 
Sexual Orientation

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England
Straight/Heterosexual
97.77%
97.18%
96.57%

Not Straight/Heterosexual
2.23%
2.82%
3.43%

Gay/Lesbian
1.25%
1.42%
1.67%

Bisexual
0.76%
1.14%
1.39%

Other
0.22%
0.26%
0.37%

Source: Census 2021

 
Gender Identity
The table below classifies residents aged 16 years and over in Calverton ward, Nottinghamshire and England by how they self-reported their gender identity in the 2021 Census.

The gender identity question in the 2021 Census was voluntary. Whilst the ONS predominantly present these figures as a proportion of the overall population, the table below uses only people who responded to the gender identity question as the denominator. These indicators therefore represent the gender identity breakdowns as a proportion of all who responded to this question. This provides additional value as the response rate to this question can vary considerably across local areas.

NOTE: The British Sociological Society <em>argue</em> em> at these results are implausible with regard to geography, language, education, ethnicity, and religion. The results contradict data on referrals to gender clinics and signatures on a pro-transgender petition. The results are also internally inconsistent when the various categories of gender identity are correlated across localities, and when compared with sexual orientation. The question evidently confused a substantial number of respondents who erroneously declared their gender identity to differ from their natal sex. Confusion is manifested in the overrepresentation of people lacking English proficiency in the most suspect gender categories. Results should therefore be interpreted with caution./em>

In Calverton ward, 0.15% of all people who responded to the gender identity question reported an identity different from the sex they were registered with at birth (but with no specific identity given). This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (0.15%) and lower than the proportion in England (0.26%).
 
Gender Identity

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England
Same as Birth
99.77%
99.62%
99.42%

Different From Birth: No Specific Identity
0.15%
0.15%
0.26%

Trans Woman
0.04%
0.07%
0.11%

Trans Man
0.01%
0.07%
0.11%

Other Identities
0.03%
0.09%
0.11%

Source: Census 2021

 
Non-Response Rates

As explained above, the questions relating to sexual orientation and gender identity in the 2021 Census were voluntary. The chart below gives more insight into these figures by showing the proportion of all people aged 16+ who did not respond to these questions. This can provide useful context as there are a multitude of possible driving factors behind non-response rates, which are not necessarily related to sexual orientation and gender identity.
6.24% of all people aged 16+ in Calverton ward did not respond to the sexual orientation question. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire (6.43%) and lower than the proportion in England (7.46%).
4.19% of all people aged 16+ in Calverton ward did not respond to the gender identity question. This is lower than the proportion in Nottinghamshire (5.14%) and lower than the proportion in England (5.98%).
 
Non-response rates to the sexual orientation and gender identity questions


Source: Census 2021

 

Population (Migration) The following data visualisations offer insight into measures related to migration. This includes; number of migrants, residency length, passport holder status, national insurance numbers issued, and English language capabilities.
 
People Who Have Moved Address in the Last Year
The chart below shows the number and proportion of migrants in the local area. The information is taken from 2011 and 2021 Censuses. Here a migrant is defined as a person with a different address one year before the Census to that on Census Day. The migrant status for children aged under one in households is determined by the migrant status of their next of kin.

In Calverton ward the proportion of migrants has decreased since 2011, from 8.22% to 7.57%.
 
People Who Have Moved Address in the Last Year


Source: Census 2011/2021

 
Residency Length
The bar chart below shows the population composition by residency length. It is the proportion of people who have migrated to the UK from other countries (international migrants). Figures are self-reported from the 2021 Census.
 
UK Residency Length


Source: Census 2021

 
Passport Holder Status
The chart below shows the population composition by passport holder status.

In Calverton ward, 16.7% of the population do not have a passport. This is similar to the proportion without passports in Nottinghamshire with 17.05% and greater than the proportion without passports in England with 13.16%.
 
Passport Holder Status

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
No Passport
1,266
16.70%
140,629
17.05%
7,436,503
13.16%

UK Passport
6,197
81.75%
641,738
77.80%
43,288,686
76.63%

Republic of Ireland Passport
21
0.28%
2,446
0.30%
354,924
0.63%

EU Passport
59
0.78%
30,364
3.68%
3,447,188
6.10%

Non-EU Passport
1
0.01%
870
0.11%
168,982
0.30%

African Passport
2
0.03%
2,132
0.26%
370,155
0.66%

Middle East & Asian Passport
12
0.16%
4,873
0.59%
1,052,326
1.86%

North American & Caribbean Passport
15
0.20%
962
0.12%
199,308
0.35%

Antarctica & Oceania Passport
4
0.05%
419
0.05%
75,389
0.13%

British Overseas Territories Passport
0
0.00%
9
0.00%
629
0.00%

Source: Census 2021

 
National Insurance Numbers Issued
The line chart below shows the proportion of people registering with a National Insurance number who have come from overseas since 2011.

In Calverton ward, the proportion of National Insurance numbers issued to people from overseas in 2024 was 0.16%. This is similar to the proportion in Nottinghamshire with 0.59% and less than the proportion in England with 1.52%.

Note: For the years 2020 & 2021 The process was disrupted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic causing a significant reduction in the number allocated.
 
National Insurance Numbers Issued to Non-UK Nationals


Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

 
English as a Main Language
The boxes below show the percentage of households where not everyone speaks English as a main language. It aims to classify households by the combination of adults and children within a household that have English as a main language.

In Calverton ward, 0.45% of households have no people that have English as a main language within them. This is less than the proportion in Nottinghamshire with 2.59% and less than the proportion in England with 5.02%.
 
No People in Household have English as a Main Language

15

0.45% (Nottinghamshire = 2.59%, England = 5.02%)

At Least One Person in Household (Aged 16+) Has English as a Main Language

28

0.84% (Nottinghamshire = 1.67%, England = 4.34%)

No Adults, but One Person Aged 3-15 Has English as a Main Language

7

0.21% (Nottinghamshire = 0.65%, England = 1.38%)


Source: Census 2021

 
English Proficiency
The table below provides insight into the different levels of English proficiency of people aged three and over whose main language is not English. Figures are self-reported and taken from the English language proficiency questions in the 2021 Census.

In Calverton ward, 0.08% of people without English as their main language cannot speak English at all. This is less than the proportion in Nottinghamshire with 0.7% that cannot speak English and less than the proportion in England with 1.57% that cannot speak English.
 
English Proficiency

Indicator
Calverton ward
Nottinghamshire
England

 
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Count
Rate
Can Speak English Very Well
30
0.41%
14,880
1.86%
2,212,300
4.05%

Can Speak English Well
24
0.33%
13,209
1.65%
1,803,439
3.30%

Cannot Speak English Well
4
0.05%
800
0.10%
156,892
0.29%

Cannot Speak English
6
0.08%
5,570
0.70%
861,288
1.57%

Source: Census 2021

Appendix: Data sources  
Theme
Data
Data source / time period
Access and Transport
Households with no car  (E&W Census 2011)
Census 2011 (2011)

Access and Transport
Households with no car (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest employment centre by public transport/walk (with more than 500 jobs)
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest employment centre by public transport/walk (with more than 5000 jobs)
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest Further Education Institution by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest GP by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest Hospital by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest Primary School by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest Secondary School by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest supermarket by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Travel time to nearest town centre by public transport/walk
Department for Transport (DfT) (2019)

Access and Transport
Jobs Access Score
UK Onward (2021)

Access and Transport
PPFI Ecommerce Access Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Fuel Poverty Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Food for Families Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Non-Supermarket Proximity Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Supermarket Proximity Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Supermarket Accessibility Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
PPFI Socio-Demographic Barriers Domain (Rank)
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH A&E Hospitals
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Dentists
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH GP surgeries
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Leisure Centres
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Pharmacies
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Fast food outlets
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Gambling outlets
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Pubs/bars/nightclubs
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Access and Transport
AHAH Tobacconists and Vape Stores
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2024)

Community
Community Needs Index 2023: Community Needs rank
Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) (2023)

Community
Community Needs Index 2023: Active and Engaged Community rank
Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) and Local Trust (2023)

Community
Community Needs Index 2023: Civic Assets rank
Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) (2023)

Community
Community Needs Index 2023: Connectedness rank
Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) (2023)

Living Environment
IoD 2019 Living Environment Rank
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) (2019)

Living Environment
IoD 2019 Indoors Sub-domain Rank
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) (2019)

Living Environment
IoD 2019 Outdoors Sub-domain Rank
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) (2019)

Crime
Total crime offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Anti-social behaviour (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Bicycle theft offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Burglary (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Criminal damage (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Drug crime offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Other crime offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Other theft offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Possession of weapons offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Public order offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Robbery recorded offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Shoplifting offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Theft from the person offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Vehicle crime (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Violent crime and sexual offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Mar-2024 to Feb-2025)

Crime
Total crime offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Dec-2010 to Nov-2011)

Crime
Anti-social behaviour (12 month total)
Police UK (Sep-2018 to Aug-2019)

Crime
Violent crime and sexual offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Sep-2018 to Aug-2019)

Crime
Burglary (12 month total)
Police UK (Sep-2018 to Aug-2019)

Crime
Criminal damage (12 month total)
Police UK (Sep-2018 to Aug-2019)

Crime
Shoplifting offences (12 month total)
Police UK (Sep-2018 to Aug-2019)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 65 to 69
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 70 to 74
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 75 to 79
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 80 to 84
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 85 to 89
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 90 and over
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Demographics (Older People)
Population aged 65 and over
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2011)

Demographics (Older People)
Pensioners in poverty (Pension Credit)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Feb-2015)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Cultural Creators
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Rational Utilitarians
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: Passive and Uncommitted Users
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Mainstream
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Veterans
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: Settled Offline Communities
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: Digital Seniors
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Professionals
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: e-Withdrawn
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Internet User Classification: Youthful Urban Fringe
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2017)

Digital
Digital Propensity Index (DPI)
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2021)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 1
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 2
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 3
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 4
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 5
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 6
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 7
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 8
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 9
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
IoD 2019 Income Decile 10
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Working age Benefit claimants (Benefit combinations)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (May-2018)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: No work requirements
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Planning for work
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Preparing for work
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Searching for work
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Working (No requirements)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Universal Credit claimants - Conditionality Regime: Working (With requirements)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Mar-2025)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Family type, single with dependent children
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Carer Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Child Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Disabled Child Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit - Limited Capability for Work Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit with Housing Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Housing Entitlement, Social rented
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Households on Universal Credit, Housing Entitlement, Private rented
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Economy (Deprivation and Low Income)
Housing Benefit
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Jan-2020)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Full-time employees (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Part-time employees (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Self-employed people (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Managers, directors and senior officials (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Professional occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Associate professional and technical occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Administrative and secretarial occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Skilled trades occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Caring, leisure and other service occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Sales and customer service occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Process, plant and machine operatives (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Elementary occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Managers, directors and senior officials (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Professional occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Economic Activity)
Occupation group: Associate professional and technical occupations (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Income and Debt)
Personal debt (unsecured loans) per person aged 18+
UK Finance (Mar-2017)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs density (jobs as a ratio of the working age population)
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2009)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Full-time employees
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Part-time employees
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Public sector employees
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Private sector employees
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in accommodation and food services (hospitality)
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in agriculture, forestry and fishing
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in arts, entertainment, recreation and other services
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in business administration and support services
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in construction
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in education
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in financial and insurance
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in health
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in information and communication
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in manufacturing
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in mining, quarrying and utilities
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in motor trades
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in professional, scientific and technical
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in property
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in public administration and defence
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in retail
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in transport and storage (inc postal)
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Jobs in wholesale
Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES) (2023)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
All VAT based local units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2011)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Private sector business units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Central government business units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Public corporation business units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Local government business units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Public sector business units
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in arts, entertainment, recreation and other services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in business administration and support services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in construction
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in education
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in health
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in accommodation and food services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in motor trades
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in information and communication
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in manufacturing and production
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in professional, scientific & technical services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in property and business services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in public administration and other services
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in the retail industry
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in transport
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
VAT based local units in wholesale
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2024)

Economy (Jobs and Businesses)
Gross Value Added (GVA) per head
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 1
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 2
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 3
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 4
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 5
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 6
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 7
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 8
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 9
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
IoD 2019 Employment Decile 10
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Claiming out of work benefits (Benefit Combinations)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (May-2018)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Unemployment benefit claimants (Jobseekers Allowance and out of work Universal Credit claimants)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Jan-2015)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Youth unemployment (18-24 receiving JSA or Universal Credit)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2016)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Economically active: Unemployed (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Economically inactive: Long-term sick or disabled (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Economically inactive: Retired (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Economically inactive: Looking after home or family (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Economy (Unemployment and Wider Worklessness)
Economically inactive: Other (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
People with no qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 1 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 2 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 3 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Apprenticeship (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 4/5 (degree or higher) qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Other qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
People with no qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 1 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 2 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 3 qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
Highest level of qualification: Level 4/5 (degree or higher) qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
People with no qualifications (E&W Census 2011)
Census 2021 (2011)

Education
People with no qualifications (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 1
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 2
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 3
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 4
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 5
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 6
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 7
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 8
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 10
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Education
IoD 2019 Education Decile 9
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Energy (Fuel Poverty and Consumption)
Households in Fuel Poverty
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (link) (2011)

Energy (Fuel Poverty and Consumption)
Prepayment electricity meters
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) (2017)

Health (Children)
Children 0-19 in relative low-income out of work families (as % of all in relative low-income families)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2024)

Health (Children)
Children 0-19 in relative low-income in-work families (as % of all in relative low-income families)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2024)

Health (Children)
Children 0-19 in relative low-income lone parent families (as % of all in relative low-income families)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2024)

Health (Children)
Children 0-19 in relative low-income couple families (as % of all in relative low-income families)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2024)

Health (Children)
Children providing unpaid care (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (Children)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: All Causes Under 5s
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Jan-2025)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Disability benefit (DLA)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Aug-2024)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Older people social care benefit (Attendance Allowance)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Aug-2024)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Households on Universal Credit, Disabled Child Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Households on Universal Credit - Limited Capability for Work Entitlement
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Nov-2024)

Health (Disability and Long-Term Illness)
Personal Independence Payment (PIP)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (Apr-2013)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 1
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 2
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 3
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 4
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 5
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 6
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 7
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 8
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 9
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
IoD 2019 Health Decile 10
Communities and Local Government (CLG) (2019)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Very good health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Good health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Fair health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Bad health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Very bad health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Very bad health  (E&W Census 2011)
Census 2011 (2011)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Very bad health (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Asthma prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Cancer prevalence (diagnosis since 2003)
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Coronary Heart Disease prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Chronic Kidney Disease prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
COPD prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Dementia prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Depression prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Diabetes prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Epilepsy prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Heart Failure prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
High Blood Pressure prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Learning Disabilities prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Obesity prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Osteoporosis prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Peripheral Arterial Disease prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Pre-Diabetes prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Rheumatoid Arthritis prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack prevalence
NHS Digital via House of Commons Library (2022/23)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: All Causes
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: Coronary Heart Disease
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: Hip Fracture (65+)
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: Myocardial Infarction
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
Emergency Hospital Admissions: Stroke
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
No unpaid care (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
9 hours or less unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
10 to 19 hours unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
20 to 34 hours unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
35 to 49 hours unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
50+ hours unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
50+ hours unpaid care a week  (E&W Census 2011)
Census 2011 (2011)

Health (General Health and Unpaid Care)
50+ hours unpaid care a week (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Health (Mortality)
Male life expectancy at birth
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (Mortality)
Female life expectancy at birth
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2021)

Health (Mortality)
IoD Years of Potential Life Lost
Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) (2012)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths (all causes)
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths from cancer
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths all ages, coronary heart disease (CHD)
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths all ages, circulatory disease
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths all ages, respiratory disease
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Health (Mortality)
Deaths all ages, stroke
Office for Health Improvements and Disparities (OHID) (2016 to 2020)

Housing (Affordability)
Average house price (12 months)
Land Registry (Jun-2018 to May-2019)

Housing (Affordability)
Ratio of residential property transactions to number of private dwellings
Land Registry (Mar-2020 to Feb-2021)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band A
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band B
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band C
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band D
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band E
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band F
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band G
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Affordability)
Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band - Band H
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024-2025)

Housing (Characteristics)
Detached housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Semi-detached housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Terraced housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Purpose built flats (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Flats in a converted house (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Flats in a commercial building (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Caravan or other temporary accommodation (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Detached housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Semi-detached housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Terraced housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Purpose built flats (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Flats in a converted house (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Flats in a commercial building (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Caravan or other temporary accommodation (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing owned outright (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing owned with a mortgage or a loan (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing in shared ownership (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing rented from council (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing rented from a Housing Association (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Private rented housing: Private landlord or letting agency (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Private rented: Other (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Living rent free (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing owned outright (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing owned with a mortgage or a loan (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing in shared ownership (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing rented from council (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Housing rented from a Housing Association (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Private rented housing: Private landlord or letting agency (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Private rented: Other (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Living rent free (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
1 room (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
2 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
3 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
4 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
5 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
6 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
7 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
8 rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwellings with 9 or more rooms (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built before 1900
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1900 to 1918
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1919 to 1929
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1930 to 1939
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1945 to 1954
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1955 to 1964
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1965 to 1972
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1973 to 1982
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1983 to 1992
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 1993 to 1999
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 2000 to 2009
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 2010 to 2019
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Characteristics)
Dwelling stock built between 2020 to 2024
Valuation Office Agency (VOA) (2024)

Housing (Condition)
Overcrowded housing (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Overcrowded housing (bedrooms) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Mains gas only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Wood only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Tank or bottled gas only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Solid fuel only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Renewable energy only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: District or communal heat networks only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Other central heating only (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Two or more types of central heating (including renewable energy) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Heating: Two or more types of central heating (not including renewable energy) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Housing (Condition)
Dwellings with low energy efficiency (F-G rating)
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) (Jan-2023)

Housing (Condition)
Dwellings with medium energy efficiency (D-E rating)
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) (Jan-2023)

Housing (Condition)
Dwellings with high energy efficiency (A-C rating)
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) (Jan-2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Overall rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Wall insulation rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Floor insulation rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Roof insulation rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Property type rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Property age rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Housing (Condition)
Priority Places for Insulation Index: Insulation installation firm supply rank
Consumer Data Research Centre (CDRC) (2023)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Total population estimate
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Population aged 0 to 15
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Population aged 16 to 64
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Population aged 65 and over
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 90 and over
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 90 and over
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 85 to 89
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 85 to 89
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 80 to 84
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 80 to 84
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 75 to 79
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 75 to 79
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 70 to 74
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 70 to 74
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 65 to 69
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 65 to 69
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 60 to 64
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 60 to 64
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 55 to 59
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 55 to 59
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 50 to 54
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 50 to 54
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 45 to 49
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 45 to 49
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 40 to 44
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 40 to 44
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 35 to 39
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 35 to 39
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 30 to 34
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 30 to 34
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 25 to 29
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 25 to 29
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 20 to 24
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 20 to 24
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 15 to 19
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 15 to 19
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 10 to 14
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 10 to 14
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 5 to 9
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 5 to 9
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Male population aged 0 to 4
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Female population aged 0 to 4
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Total population estimate
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2011)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Population density (persons per sq/km)
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One person household: Aged 66 years and over (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Living alone (aged under 66) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: All aged 66 and over (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: No children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: Dependent children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: All children non-dependent (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Cohabiting couple: No children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Cohabiting couple: Dependent children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Cohabiting couple: All children non-dependent (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Lone parent: Dependent children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
One family only: Lone parent: All children non-dependent (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Other household types: With dependent children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Multiple-family household: With dependent children (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Demographic Summary)
Other household types: Other, including all full-time students and all aged 66 years and over (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in Asian ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in Black ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in Mixed ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in White ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in Other (inclusive of Arabs) ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
White Irish (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
White Gypsy or Irish Traveller (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
White Roma (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
White Other (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Mixed White and Black Caribbean (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Mixed White and Black African (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Mixed White and Asian (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Indian (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Pakistani (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Bangladeshi (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Chinese (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Black African (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Black Caribbean (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People in Arab ethnic group (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in the UK (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in EU14 countries (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in EU8 countries (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in EU2 countries (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in other EU countries (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in Europe: Non-EU countries (2021 Census) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in Africa (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in Middle East and Asia (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in the Americas and the Caribbean (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Born in Antarctica and Oceania (including Australasia) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
British Overseas (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Buddhist (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Christian (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Hindu (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Jewish (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Muslim (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Sikh (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
Other religion (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Ethnicity)
People with no religious belief (% of all respondents) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Straight or Heterosexual (as a % of all responding to the sexual orientation question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Not Straight or Heterosexual (as a % of all responding to the sexual orientation question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Gay or Lesbian (as a % of all responding to the sexual orientation question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Bisexual (as a % of all responding to the sexual orientation question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
All other sexual orientations (as a % of all responding to the sexual orientation question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Gender identity the same as sex registered at birth (as a % of all responding to the gender identity question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Gender identity different from sex registered at birth but no specific identity given (as a % of all responding to the gender identity question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Trans woman (as a % of all responding to the gender identity question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Trans man (as a % of all responding to the gender identity question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
All other gender identities (as a % of all responding to the gender identity question) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Non respondents to the sexual orientation question (as a % of all aged 16+) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Gender and Sexual Orientation)
Non respondents to the gender identity question (as a % of all aged 16+) (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
People who have moved address in the last year (E&W Census 2011)
Census 2021 (2011)

Population (Migration)
People who have moved address in the last year (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Resident in UK: Less than 2 years (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Resident in UK: 2 years or more but less than 5 years (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Resident in UK: 5 years or more but less than 10 years (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Resident in UK: 10 years or more (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
No passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
United Kingdom passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Republic of Ireland passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
EU passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Non-EU passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
African passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Middle East and Asian passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
North American or Caribbean passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Antarctica and Oceania passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
British Overseas Territories passport (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
National Insurance numbers issued to non-UK nationals
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2011)

Population (Migration)
Main language is not English: Can speak English very well (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Main language is not English: Can speak English well (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Main language is not English: Cannot speak English well (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Population (Migration)
Main language is not English: Cannot speak English (Census 2021)
Census 2021 (2021)

Core hold a hooler hooping club and belly dancing